spujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agorule briani.imgur.comimagemessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up171file-text
arrow-up171imagerule briani.imgur.comspujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square22linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·21 hours agoWait, a .ml user confusing socialists and social democrats? That kind of blunder is reserved for .world users! Jokes aside, social democrats and socialists are mutually exclusive. Social democracy is capitalism, socialism is by definition not.
minus-squarebalsoft@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoNowadays the umbrella is pretty broad, people like Mamdani are often indeed called or identify as socdems, and yet they’re also reformist socialists. I just had a brainfart and swapped the words “democratic” and “socialist” around, my bad
minus-squarecloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·17 hours agoYup! That’s why democratic socialists are a thing! Though, I think that term only exists to emphasize that socialism is not inherently antidemocratic, as red scare bs would have one beleive.
Wait, a .ml user confusing socialists and social democrats? That kind of blunder is reserved for .world users!
Jokes aside, social democrats and socialists are mutually exclusive. Social democracy is capitalism, socialism is by definition not.
Nowadays the umbrella is pretty broad, people like Mamdani are often indeed called or identify as socdems, and yet they’re also reformist socialists.I just had a brainfart and swapped the words “democratic” and “socialist” around, my bad
Yup! That’s why democratic socialists are a thing! Though, I think that term only exists to emphasize that socialism is not inherently antidemocratic, as red scare bs would have one beleive.
deleted by creator