• yaroto98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They can’t really make linux illegal. They’ll make selling devices without age verification illegal. Essentially making selling devices with an OS that doesn’t play ball illegal.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just means we will have to wipe the preinstalled OS, as is already the custom. Also means there will likely be efforts to lock down consumer devices similar to how Android OEMs make it difficult to impossible to unlock the bootloader

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They can’t make it illegal, but with a little frog-boiling, they can make it functionally useless for visiting websites you might need to use. No identity verification = no access, and Linux = no identity verification.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not if they use cryptographic signing.

          Browser sends website the signed identity verification, then the website checks the signature against some key in a list of trusted identity verifiers. With the verification responsibility being pushed to the OS vendors, that will be a short list of tech megacorporations. And maybe Canonical or Red Hat, if we’re lucky.

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Indeed, but wouldn’t the inevitable database breach give ample “identities” for anonymous users to cycle through (similar to aurora for play store infrastructure)?

            To be clear, the circumstances are not good and ideally this destructive behavior is averted, but there will be maneuvers which can be taken if worst comes to worst.

            • pivot_root@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Good point. I’m not keen on personally comitting fraud, but with the inevitable data breaches in mind, identity verification would do absolutely nothing to deter malicious actors.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hear the latest efforts (mainly from the System76 guy) to counter bad bills about age verification/attestation have brought amendments to exempt open source operating systems, in at least one jurisdiction.

    So the pedo-cabal’s plan to protect our children (by doxing them), has a gaping hole in it.

    Oh however will the pedo-cabal manage to protect our children now?

    :3

    • JoshCodes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah they’ll drop this as soon as they realise The Dreaded Kali Linux Hacker OS System is open source tbh. First cyber attack, they’ll realise they didnt know the owner of the malicious device’s age, cry on TV then amend the law to include it.

      Meanwhile the number of school shootings will remain the same, foster care systems will be underfunded, but the children will be rendered safe.

      Remind me, if everyone is a child until proven otherwise as implemented by discord etc, are they still allowed to collect my data when I dont age verify? Can I sue them for collecting what could have been a toddlers information as they couldn’t possibly have known I wasn’t one?

      Its all so fucking stupid.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s as simple of finding out how to download a local copy of any media or software you want to store for safekeeping, ideally with backups on a separate drive/machine.

        Some good places to start would be linux ISOs and Wikipedia (both are freely distributed and quite useful im times of need), but obviously for any media secured by a paywall or not meant for us to “own”, you’ll have to find your own path. Probably would be worth checking the piracy lemmy comm.

        Personally, I archive everything. I stream nothing.

        • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wikipedia is a good shout. What Linux isos are worth hoarding? I tend to prefer rolling release distros and their isos are usually useful for system rescue, but normally rely on having an internet connection to actually do the install so probably wouldn’t be much use in an outage.

      • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Start with something like Kiwix. You can use that to download ALL of wikipedia. You can keep that on a thumb drive.

        After that, start thinking hard about what you might want to access.

        I like GOG for gaming, because I can download the DRM-free installer without the need for the internet later.

        Whatever eBook library you “own” right now? Download it.

        Do you still have a bunch of DVDs? Preserve them.

        Any CDs sitting around? Rip those tracks.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Same here. I originally wanted something big and complex, but I went with Linux Mint. I am quite comfortable with mint. I might move up to Fedora (while literally wearing a fedora…).

    It is fucking insane how they’re so intense in their authoritarianism while somehow claiming to be all about freedom. Palantir’s technological republic post is really fucking insane, claiming that public officials need to be absolutely above criticism (thus giving THEM the only right to privacy) while the rest of us need a microscope attached to every aspect of our lives.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hell, if only they made Linux open source so that we could change anything we didn’t like about the age verification stuff.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is a bit hyperbole at the moment, where the concrete lawd are basically “os asks user for age on honor system and relays that to websites”. Linux distros can add that without much real controversy.

      Proven is some are seeking laws that require the os to actually verify age, which in practice means locking things behind something like a Google account and having an online account vendor process your real identity and really validate your age. Under such a regime, Linux desktop as it exists today becomes infeasible. Also Microsoft can say they absolutely cannot allow local accounts anymore by law and force Microsoft accounts…

    • FatherPeanut@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tl;Dr: is that age verification laws are being pushed heavily, and Linux users are strongly against that sorta stuff. Most developers openly say they won’t comply, thus their software is in violation.

    • eierschaukeln@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The laws generally apply to devices that connect to the internet and run an OS, excluding simple appliances or legacy offline systems. Smartphones and Tablets: (iOS, Android) Personal Computers: (Windows, macOS, ChromeOS, Linux distributions with GUIs that connect to the internet)

      Means just use Linux without GUI and you have a bypass smh 🙂🙂👍👍

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    At least in the US there’s precedent that source code is protected speech, so we may see the year of the Gentoo desktop.