• ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Same here. I originally wanted something big and complex, but I went with Linux Mint. I am quite comfortable with mint. I might move up to Fedora (while literally wearing a fedora…).

    It is fucking insane how they’re so intense in their authoritarianism while somehow claiming to be all about freedom. Palantir’s technological republic post is really fucking insane, claiming that public officials need to be absolutely above criticism (thus giving THEM the only right to privacy) while the rest of us need a microscope attached to every aspect of our lives.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hell, if only they made Linux open source so that we could change anything we didn’t like about the age verification stuff.

    • eierschaukeln@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      The laws generally apply to devices that connect to the internet and run an OS, excluding simple appliances or legacy offline systems. Smartphones and Tablets: (iOS, Android) Personal Computers: (Windows, macOS, ChromeOS, Linux distributions with GUIs that connect to the internet)

      Means just use Linux without GUI and you have a bypass smh 🙂🙂👍👍

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Is a bit hyperbole at the moment, where the concrete lawd are basically “os asks user for age on honor system and relays that to websites”. Linux distros can add that without much real controversy.

      Proven is some are seeking laws that require the os to actually verify age, which in practice means locking things behind something like a Google account and having an online account vendor process your real identity and really validate your age. Under such a regime, Linux desktop as it exists today becomes infeasible. Also Microsoft can say they absolutely cannot allow local accounts anymore by law and force Microsoft accounts…

    • FatherPeanut@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Tl;Dr: is that age verification laws are being pushed heavily, and Linux users are strongly against that sorta stuff. Most developers openly say they won’t comply, thus their software is in violation.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I hear the latest efforts (mainly from the System76 guy) to counter bad bills about age verification/attestation have brought amendments to exempt open source operating systems, in at least one jurisdiction.

    So the pedo-cabal’s plan to protect our children (by doxing them), has a gaping hole in it.

    Oh however will the pedo-cabal manage to protect our children now?

    :3

    • JoshCodes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah they’ll drop this as soon as they realise The Dreaded Kali Linux Hacker OS System is open source tbh. First cyber attack, they’ll realise they didnt know the owner of the malicious device’s age, cry on TV then amend the law to include it.

      Meanwhile the number of school shootings will remain the same, foster care systems will be underfunded, but the children will be rendered safe.

      Remind me, if everyone is a child until proven otherwise as implemented by discord etc, are they still allowed to collect my data when I dont age verify? Can I sue them for collecting what could have been a toddlers information as they couldn’t possibly have known I wasn’t one?

      Its all so fucking stupid.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    At least in the US there’s precedent that source code is protected speech, so we may see the year of the Gentoo desktop.