• doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They’re not unrelated. Lauded projects to rewrite some gpled c thing in rust are almost universally mit licensed.

    Attempts to get those licenses changed are almost universally met with a line in the sand.

    • ISO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There are a lot less GPL projects in your system than you might think. Your core system is already filled with liberally licensed libraries and programs. Case in point, since you talked about rust rewrites, original sudo is not GPL software.

      • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh no, a non gpl package on my computer? How did you find out about my one weakness! I’m melting, melting! Oh, what a world, what a cruel, cruel world!

        • ISO@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If you’re posting from Desktop Linux, your comment utilized at least 10 liberally licensed libraries. And that’s before it got into the wire. GPL packages are a MINORITY, not a majority with exceptions.

      • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It establishes and defends intellectual property held in common by all of humanity.

        N.B. held in common, not public domain. The property and right of all people for all time.

        Our new present and its future requires the defense of ideas for all.

        Of course, if you want to feel smug and know you’re on the winning team then be assured we are going to be losing copyleft soon.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Our new present and its future requires the defense of ideas for all.

          And MIT is lacking because it doesn’t force commercial users to lie about what they do behind closed doors? Trust me, if they are so inclined, they already do plenty of that. Next, with LLM assistance, all your copyleft code is freely available for word-salad-surgery remix and rebrand with whatever license anybody wants - as it always has been, LLMs just cut the labor required to do so by a huge margin.

          • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yes. MIT is literally lacking that protection because it doesn’t force corporate users to lie or do their own work.

            Should the fact that the powerful act with impunity when not challenged be an argument against challenging them? That’s a little facile…

            Again, if you just want to feel good that the things I care about are going away, rest assured that llm output is going to remove the concept of copyleft in advance of a multipolar world where secrets and incompatibility are suddenly the order of the day.