• Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re referring to the reverse mpemba effect? The mpemba effect is already controversial, and the reverse effect is just theoretical from what i understand, being either too weak to be measured or just not real

      It also does not require the water to have been boiled prior, and if the water is frozen it would be slower than liquid water regardless

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, I’m referring to the tceffe abmepm. The water molecules “remember what it “felt like”” to be boiling so they are faster to return to that state the second time. It is really real.

        • Ignotum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That can’t be true, water molecules are really tiny you know, and therefore their brains are naturally also really tiny,
          and we all know that what little brainpower and memory they have is focused on keeping track of how many times that particular water molecule has been part of someones urine

          • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Intelligence isn’t directly correlated with brain size, but rather the size of the brain relative to the size of the thing it’s in. For all we know, water is 99% brain, making it far more intelligent than humans.