But Trump was showing early signs of dementia during his first term. He’s showing signs of rapidly-advancing dementia now. Non-dementia health claims about other politicians without evidence in no way discredit the claim that he’s visibly declining with dementia symptoms. The difference here is evidence. (And is it really an improbable that an elderly President would suffer dementia in his second term, and that his staff would try to cover it up?)
But Trump was showing early signs of dementia during his first term. He’s showing signs of rapidly-advancing dementia now. Non-dementia health claims about other politicians without evidence in no way discredit the claim that he’s visibly declining with dementia symptoms. The difference here is evidence. (And is it really an improbable that an elderly President would suffer dementia in his second term, and that his staff would try to cover it up?)
That’s what was reported. But, again, none of this reporting is reliable. It’s all just court gossip.
It’s credulity. Liberals are more receptive to “conservatives in decline” than they are when it is reported of their own politicians.
That’s why Feinstein got to die in office without facing any kind of serious challenger. And why Schumer will benefit from the same.