It’s proprietary, after all. I understand paid is fine, but even then, it usually better be open source.

So, why is Unraid an exception ?

Thanks

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    The big thing is very easily mix and match different sizes of disks. ZFS as of recently can sort of do that, but its not as efficient.

    • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Mergerfs can do that too and you can keep the underlying fs as whatever you want.

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It has no parity, you can pair with snapraid but thats snapshot parity and not real-time parity. Depends on the use case if that would work or not.

        Also no caching options.

        • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Valid points. I use it for my media collection I can easily restore and won’t miss. Cache would be sort of nice to have and redundancy would just be wasting space.

      • B0rax@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yes, but it does not have redundancy or caching. Redundancy can be achieved with snapraid, but how you get caching I don’t know…

        • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Doesn’t work for every use case, but perfect for mine. I was just pointing out other options.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Can it access a file without spinning up all disks in the array?

        I haven’t used ZFS in like a decade, but would strongly consider going back to it if it can do that now.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    They had the right product at the right time. No other free or paid alternative was that user friendly in allowing laymen in mixing and matching multiple disks and having redundancy

    Doing that with pure Linux command line at the time it was inconceivable for 99% of users (at most a raid1 with mdadm over two drives could be easily attained) and windows home server initially was an alternative but Microsoft was completely misguided and “improvements” in Windows home server 2 completely killed it

    Then they added docker support and it was even easier to self host everything.

    But if they tried to launch today, with how mature are free alternatives, they would never reach critical mass adoption to be sustainable.

    For example, I don’t think that the paid fork of truenas that LTT has economically backed is going to be successful

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      For example, I don’t think that the paid fork of truenas that LTT has economically backed is going to be successful

      Maybe not in the short term.
      But he mentions them on every ocassion they’d use TrueNAS that doesnt require advanced configuration.

      And it really is just a pretty frontend with some additional features.
      So I don’t see why it can’t be successful (except for too high prices)

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      As an user that paid for windows home server, why windows home server 2(011) was a complete failure

      1. Updating to whs2 required a full wipe - unacceptable by everyone
      2. Updating to whs2 required to pay full price and not upgrade price - lol
      3. The system drive wasn’t covered by redundancy and you would lose all the settings if the drive died
      4. The data drives also couldn’t get any kind of redundancy as they REMOVED the feature from the server and moved it to clients! What the fuck? It was the main selling point! Easy raid for everyone. What’s the purpose of the “home server” if it couldn’t pool drives, while the clients with Windows 8 home instead could set a massive, redundant, pool of 10 drives???
      5. They removed the useful feature that backed up automatically all the windows computers in the network
      6. They removed the basic features like the media gallery and such, to see that you would need windows media center… but 6 years after they killed windows media center
  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s less hassle than maintaining my homelab was when I used Ubuntu server. Just because I can do it the “hard way”, doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy easy mode and not having to do much of anything.

    They give you exactly what they promise with zero enshitification. It’s a solid product and was worth it to me to buy, just for the convenience.

    • CallMeMrFlipper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I get that. But at the same time, when shit does go wrong, it’s so much harder to work around their whole system when it’s so unfamiliar. I’m not speaking from experience with unraid. Just other NAS solutions (TrueNAS) and other “easy mode” options from other tech. I almost always end up tossing it out for the less hand-holing option. Because then I have to understand it, and if I understand it, it becomes so much easier.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ve never once had anything go wrong with Unraid. But even if I did, it’s pretty painless to restore a backup since the OS is on a USB drive and isn’t very big.

  • Greddan@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I think it’s neat. It has tons guides and plugins to do pretty much anything. Other solutions can be lacking in documentation. One big plus is the way you can just throw in whatever drives you’ve got laying around and not have to worry about them matching or anything. Is it the best performing? Probably not but it doesn’t need to be. For me it just hosts files and a bunch of fairly lightweight services.

  • Enoril@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    For me, it was the parity system and the fact that i could mix different disk sizes and the vm + graphic card pass-through setup. Unraid helped me to start in this world.

    Years later, after gaining experience on all of that and investing in dedicated pcie card and disks, I’ve moved to truenas my data and containers.

    Still using unraid for the vm part. But i plan to migrate to truenas too at some point.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Because it is beginner friendly and it has a lifetime license I guess and it is not yet enshittified.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    It is? Where? Please don’t say Reddit as that is full of advertisement bots pretending to be regular users.

    I am more surprised by how popular Proxmox seems to be here, which is really just adding a lot of unnecessary complexity, but I guess the GUI comments others here shared applies to it as well.

    • KaKi87@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      In this very community, I’ve seen plenty of Unraid posts, as much as I do on Reddit.

    • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I am more surprised by how popular Proxmox seems to be here, which is really just adding a lot of unnecessary complexity

      I switched to Proxmox for one reason: PBS. As far as I know there is no match with plain KVM. Proxmox also makes setting up and maintaining a high-availability setup very easy, which is a nice bonus.

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Has a nice UI, let’s me mix and match disks, let’s me host docker containers plus a VM with gpu pass through.

    All basically out of the box. (Ok - Pass through was a bastard) All for a one off price.

    I don’t know if there are other options that let me do all of that, unraid has always been the one mentioned.

      • nfreak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yep they changed this somewhat recently I believe? Like a year or two back, not sure - before my time.

        Last I checked I think it’s now like $50 or $60 for the first year, and renewals are half that, so definitely not terrible.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah in the past year or so. I grandfathered in before they raised the price of that highest tier so I like to be sure people are aware. I’m a big fan and I think it’s worth the price.

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Good point. I got 1 year of ultimate, with the plan to upgrade to perpetual if it was good (it is!).

        The cost of that is still less than the cost would have been to buy new matching drives.

      • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s still a one time purchase for the license. It’s only OS updates that would need to be paid for yearly after the 1st year

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Mixing disks is the #1 reason I went with unraid over any other option.

        • B0rax@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Please elaborate. I have only found that all drives will be treated as they would have the smallest capacity in the bunch.

          There is some manual workarounds, which is would not call „can do it fine“

          Or am I missing something?

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It just needed the AMD compatibility plugin, lots of time wasted until someone pointed that out though.

      • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’ve always found it helpful to use the time stone and tell “IOMMU I’ve come to bargain” until it works.

  • rotkehle @feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I just tinkered a bit with zimaos and I was pretty impressed. if it keeps getting updated I can see unraid getting a serious competitor. but yes the question still stands why there isn’t something similar beginner friendly in the opensource space.

  • Sips'@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Proprietary doesn’t necessarily have to be bad, obviously this will vary from person to person and who you ask. Personally Ive listened to enough podcasts with Unraid folks in them and read articles etc to be able base my trust in them and what they do.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Except you kinda get crucified for not using (F)OSS on lemmy^(exceptions apply)

      Exceptions I encountered:

      • Apple (to some degree)
      • Plex
      • Unraid
        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yep.
          And they released today the new version 10.11.0 with massive improvements (according to the changelog/blog) to the server.

          Make sure to try it ;)

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I think because it’s got a black background in the UI and it makes people feel like hackers. OpenMediaVault’s choice of white and light blue is way less 1337.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    You’ve mistakenly conflated the Self Hosted community with the FOSS community. There is a lot of overlap in interests between the two, but the venn diagram of those communities are not at all a circle.

    It’s a similar thing with the SH community and HomeLabbing. All home labs are selfhosted obviously, but not every stack of hardware hosting things would be considered a “home lab”.

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      This was my mistake when I started self hosting a few years ago!

      I went all-in on FOSS. And my God, it was constantly a maintenance nightmare for some apps. Some would break with updates. Some times I felt I was playing wackamole replacing one set of problems with new ones.

      Then I met a swlf-hoster who has been doing self hosting for two decades and he helped he unfuck my stuff by recommending commercial and paid services. And honestly, it was awesome because I’m too old for this shit. I just want working services.

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Decent UI. Affordable lifetime pricing. Actually just-works. No retrospective enshittification. Free tier is actually free, not ad supported.

    You get what you pay for, and you’re not the product.

      • AAA@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        But they haven’t so far, and the question was why it’s popular at this moment.

        Possible future enshittification disqualifies all software, unless you prevent it from going online - which you can also do with Unraid.

  • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I picked unRAID to be able to mix disk sizes. It also requires little maintenance in my experience, so that’s also a plus.

  • thepompe@ttrpg.networkBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ve never heard of it, but because it’s proprietary I assume useful idiots who don’t know any better use it just to fit in with each other.

    I see it a lot these days.