Okay, but they experience oppression in a very different way that also normalizes racialization and classism, which racialized trans women who disproportionately experience material insecurity obviously experience. If the point of the post is to demonstrate that these rights are interdependent, then all vectors of oppression must be acknowledged and challenged.
Which means we should erase the experiences of people who are literally being thrown into camps on the basis of race, legal citizenship, and class? Like, you don’t seem to realise that the talking point you just used is common in discourses that seek to minimize the harm of these groups.
White women suffragests insisted all women had a shared experience while obviously disregarding black women’s oppression, gay men were infamously uncooperative with lesbians and gender queer people in their activism even while claiming to speak for us all on the basis of a commonly “gay” sexuality, respectable middle-class queer people today dominate queer activism and have effectively disarmed its material and social critiques of settler-colonialism exactly because they identify their needs as universal.
That’s the point. They’re trying to construct more favourable routes of “progress” that can leave particular groups vulnerable as liberals secure their position in a post-Trumo regime. You never see them talk about Land Back either.
We skipping the immigrants rights stone already?
They can be with us on the trans stone, I’m happy calling them transnationality folks
Okay, but they experience oppression in a very different way that also normalizes racialization and classism, which racialized trans women who disproportionately experience material insecurity obviously experience. If the point of the post is to demonstrate that these rights are interdependent, then all vectors of oppression must be acknowledged and challenged.
That’s fine, I’m just saying that they can share a stone with me until we can put theirs up together c:
:3
it’s cause we are all immigrants
??? definitely are not
🥱
Didn’t know shitjustworks has an emoji for eating shit!
Which means we should erase the experiences of people who are literally being thrown into camps on the basis of race, legal citizenship, and class? Like, you don’t seem to realise that the talking point you just used is common in discourses that seek to minimize the harm of these groups.
White women suffragests insisted all women had a shared experience while obviously disregarding black women’s oppression, gay men were infamously uncooperative with lesbians and gender queer people in their activism even while claiming to speak for us all on the basis of a commonly “gay” sexuality, respectable middle-class queer people today dominate queer activism and have effectively disarmed its material and social critiques of settler-colonialism exactly because they identify their needs as universal.
That’s the point. They’re trying to construct more favourable routes of “progress” that can leave particular groups vulnerable as liberals secure their position in a post-Trumo regime. You never see them talk about Land Back either.