• Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Totally unsurprising the amount of .mlers exposing how disconnected from reality they are.

    No you do not deserve to live. If you did, you wouldn’t need to find food or clean water to survive.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      “Ugh, look at these delusional commies who think that the purpose of human society is to keep each other alive.”

      Judge us by our enemies

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Congratulations! You’re still an idiot, and what I expressed is not social Darwinism.

        If you obtain food and water, you deserve to live. If you do not obtain food or water, you deserve to die. This is how life works, it is the reason human beings need to work together to survive. If I believed in social Darwinism I’d say something stupid like “those who collect the most food and water deserve to live the most”.

        Who am I kidding, you’re basically chatGPT. This is a pointless exercise.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Not an idiot nor an LLM. You’re taking issue with people saying that society should take care of everyone, and saying those who can’t secure food or water deserve to die. Feel free to clarify further, but read literally you are saying disabled people deserve to die, and that those who support social welfare for them are wrong. This is a social Darwinist take.