• ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Maybe an unpopular opinion:

    It would be nice if the r word was not a medical condition and just a word, the word has a good sound to it in my language. I would trade easily the r word for dumb or something like that. Dumb in Portuguese is awful

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      was not a medical condition and just a word

      It is just a word. It means to delay or the opposite of “advance” and is still used like that in industries like aviation and terms like fire removedant.

      But when you use it to call someone stupid, that’s when you’re using it in the context of ablism and as a slur.

      Similar to the term for a female dog, which is still used in veterinary medicine and research to mean an actual dog that is female. Though like the R word, the context as a slur is gradually discouraging its use even as its original meaning because people don’t want to risk having it misunderstood.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Many of the bad words have that nice ring in my language, if only they weren’t offensive… I would totally trade 'em

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I mean I guess that is why they are offensive words. They are bad to use even if you know they sound so good to shout. Otherwise they would just be fun shout words like “purple nurple!”.

    • ashenone@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      No i feel you. Honestly we do need a woke slur that isn’t homophobic, racist, sexist, ableist, etc.

          • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I feel like there needs to be a good word for someone who has the capacity to do better burlt chooses to dwell in ignorance and should be ashamed of that.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              Deeply unserious usually works. They aren’t taking things seriously, or putting in any actual effort, just coasting along on their preconcieved notions.

          • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            Ghoul is the only really good one in the list. Its a generic feind thats in no way cool.

            Rogues and vampires are cool.

            Sycophant is good when someone’s being a sycophant. But you can be independently ghoulish.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              I’d argue it depends on how you use it. Calling Bezos a blood-sucking vampire of a man that lives more the more he feasts on others is pretty insulting, I’d say.

              • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                It should be, but vampires are alluring which belies their evil. That’s the cautionary part of the fiction.

                Is Bezos a soulless ghoul cannibalizing the festering, necrotic wound of poverty which he grows larger every day? Yes, and in no way can that be conflated to being sexy.