• gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Kinda makes sense tho. Either they earn money on you from ads or they make money from you because of subscription. Or you’re like me and you still block the ads even though YouTube does everything it can to stop you.

    I wouldn’t really mind watching some ads before a video, but I don’t wanna get constantly interrupted or have the ads track me everywhere. I tend to watch the in-video ads from creators tho, because most people I follow have relevant ads, funny ads, or ar the very least deserve some revenue.

  • mitch404@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s basically google’s main business. Their business is not in web search, video platform, mobile OS, email or AI, it’s ad. People forget Google is an ad company, that uses any tool available to give you ad. If it’s free and not open source, you are the product. Either to sell your attention and availability to companies through ads, or to use your data to do profiling, build a more vicious ad platform and sell your data on the side.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some of us pay ourselves to install an ad blocker and then we keep our money and we don’t get any ads.

  • jeffep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Add to this that companies would prefer showing their ads to paying customers (who have some money to spend), not the free tier plebs

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Friend one day added me to his family plan because they had one space open. I’m still in the habit of always going to youtube in ways I can ad-block but am always pleasantly surprised when I go in the normal youtube app and I have no ads. I’ll pay for the service though

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve said this a few times in various places, but I’m really surprised we aren’t allowed to bid for ad space for ourselves to not show an ad the way advertisers do for ads. Obviously a flat monthly rate is simpler, nobody is denying that, but just from a purely “free market” perspective (which shareholders love to say they want while using the government to crush opposition) why can’t I pay slightly more than whatever small amount of money someone is paying to show me an ad to not see the ad?

    Realistically I don’t think we’ll ever see that because it’s a fairly complicated. I don’t have any hard data, but I can’t imagine that the majority of users using something like YouTube Premium are getting a “good deal.” Sure, some folks probably watch all day every day and they get the better end of the deal, but I’d bet for a lot of folks YouTube makes more money off charging the subscription than they would showing the ads. Which is sort of an odd scenario we’ve gotten ourselves into (but amazing if you’re a company that serves ads).

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its a good idea but mentally people hate micro-transactions(transactions that are lower than 10cents) so they get mad every time its suggested. Plus its technically quite challenging to process those kind of transactions efficiently.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You wouldn’t prompt them every time. And it would be no more difficult than serving the ads which are also charging every time they’re shown.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          No I wouldnt prompt them at all because the costs would be so low. Even if you paid 5x what an ad pays you’d spend less than a dollar or two a week. But people hate the idea of paying half a cent when visiting a website or watching a youtube video because they think they either shouldnt have to or that it will eventually become $2 to vist that blog and $4 to watch that video and thats a horrible future.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its much better to pay YouTube so the YouTuber get money based on what the audience wants, and not what the Advertiser want from Youtube.