• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    That’s been one of the goals of just about every socio-economic system, but since are not yet at the point where we can completely automate away all undesirable jobs, it all circles back to being shit.

    • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I believe that there’s a way we can fairly share out all the shitty work among everyone, rather than a few at the top who do no work and exploit everyone, and a lot of people at the bottom who do all of the dirty work.

      We don’t need to automate everything, we just need a fair system to distribute the work evenly. We have the technology. We can do it. The reason we haven’t is because those in power benefit too much from the current system.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I don’t think I can see a way to actually accomplish that without still ending up with negative outcomes.

        Take for example a surgeon, one who is a specialist who’s time is 100% occupied saving people. Does he get taken away from that to do his time as a garbage collector? Do you tell the patient “sorry, you are going to die. You could have been saved, but we needed your surgeon to go pick up garbage.”, or do you have an exemption list?

        And if there’s an exemption list, you will never convince me that people wouldn’t start abusing who is and isn’t on that list. You arrive right back to having a class society.