LMP@lemmy.one to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 1 year agoPrivacy friendly Ubuntu antivirus ?message-squaremessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up114arrow-down1message-squarePrivacy friendly Ubuntu antivirus ?LMP@lemmy.one to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square29fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGnomeComedy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoNo, most desktops behind a NAT probably dont need fail2ban (though it wouldn’t hurt). Everyone’s security profile/needs are different. The point is that list does a hell of a lot more useful than ClamAV
minus-squareGnomeComedy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSounds like you’ve got a better solution, but I think you forgot to mention what it was.
minus-squareGnomeComedy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoIf you think ClamAV on your mom’s laptop on Starbucks WiFi is doing anything useful, but you think fail2ban isn’t - you’re naive. On phishing - you’ve got another great example. ublock origin or any other decent adblocker will do WAAAAY more to help than ClamAV.
No, most desktops behind a NAT probably dont need fail2ban (though it wouldn’t hurt).
Everyone’s security profile/needs are different.
The point is that list does a hell of a lot more useful than ClamAV
deleted by creator
Sounds like you’ve got a better solution, but I think you forgot to mention what it was.
deleted by creator
If you think ClamAV on your mom’s laptop on Starbucks WiFi is doing anything useful, but you think fail2ban isn’t - you’re naive.
On phishing - you’ve got another great example. ublock origin or any other decent adblocker will do WAAAAY more to help than ClamAV.
deleted by creator