This is giving me hope that I might actually be fine and succeed in interviews lol. On the other hand maaan I really don’t wanna maintain code written by AI-andys…
As a senior programmer I can’t write a for loop without the internet.
I can’t remember the last time I saw a job listing that didn’t expect me to be an expert in at least 5 languages. The best part is that halfway through the interview you learn that they are no longer using half the languages listed, and are “transitioning” towards 2 others that aren’t even listed. You want me to whip out examples written in Fortran, C++, Rust, JS, and some random word you claim is a language in 2 hrs without the internet? Bitch, I don’t even think I could get prewritten “Hello World” examples compiled in 5 different languages in 2 hrs, much less on machine that I have never seen before.
What ramdon ass language could they possibly be pulling out of their ass for you to he completely unable to write a for loop? I’ve yet to see a for loop, or really any sort of loop that doesn’t look pretty much exactly like the standard C style for loop
for(int x = 0; x < z; x++) {
}
If you have a C style language with iterator for loops like C++, Java and friends you almost certainly have this syntax
for(int x : numbers) {
}
Python has exclusively iterator for loops with this syntax
for x in range(z)
The only real difference is that instead of a colon : you use the in token.
At best I can see the need for a quick refresh on what the exact syntax is but if your a senior any languages you actually use should have a template for junk like this. I don’t think I’ve manually written a loop in ages, I just type out iter for an iterator for loop or when I rarely need an index fori and the rest gets stamped out for me.
If your being tested on random languages you can simply just not be familiar with a language. I haven’t touched Zig once but I’d totally be down to learn it. Everybody whos got a couple languages under their belt knows how easy it is to pick up new ones.
In G’MIC, there’s repeat(num_of_iters,_var_name,code();); on JIT code, and repeat code_block done outside of JIT. It has while, for, dowhile on JIT too. Other than repeat, there is only do while, and for which is while outside of JIT.
Note: _var_name, can be omitted. So, if you need to just repeat a code N times, that can be removed.
In the meantime, I am interviewing juniors who can’t write a while or for loop without looking on the internet…
The future is looking grim.
Should ask them to make an if loop and see what happens
This is giving me hope that I might actually be fine and succeed in interviews lol. On the other hand maaan I really don’t wanna maintain code written by AI-andys…
As a senior programmer I can’t write a for loop without the internet.
I can’t remember the last time I saw a job listing that didn’t expect me to be an expert in at least 5 languages. The best part is that halfway through the interview you learn that they are no longer using half the languages listed, and are “transitioning” towards 2 others that aren’t even listed. You want me to whip out examples written in Fortran, C++, Rust, JS, and some random word you claim is a language in 2 hrs without the internet? Bitch, I don’t even think I could get prewritten “Hello World” examples compiled in 5 different languages in 2 hrs, much less on machine that I have never seen before.
why are you booing them; they’re right!
fortran and js in the same sentence… Ugh… Not in a cold day in hell.
What ramdon ass language could they possibly be pulling out of their ass for you to he completely unable to write a for loop? I’ve yet to see a for loop, or really any sort of loop that doesn’t look pretty much exactly like the standard C style for loop
for(int x = 0; x < z; x++) { }
If you have a C style language with iterator for loops like C++, Java and friends you almost certainly have this syntax
for(int x : numbers) { }
Python has exclusively iterator for loops with this syntax
for x in range(z)
The only real difference is that instead of a colon
:
you use thein
token.At best I can see the need for a quick refresh on what the exact syntax is but if your a senior any languages you actually use should have a template for junk like this. I don’t think I’ve manually written a loop in ages, I just type out
iter
for an iterator for loop or when I rarely need an indexfori
and the rest gets stamped out for me.If your being tested on random languages you can simply just not be familiar with a language. I haven’t touched Zig once but I’d totally be down to learn it. Everybody whos got a couple languages under their belt knows how easy it is to pick up new ones.
In G’MIC, there’s
repeat(num_of_iters,_var_name,code(););
on JIT code, and repeat code_block done outside of JIT. It has while, for, dowhile on JIT too. Other than repeat, there is only do while, and for which is while outside of JIT.Note:
_var_name,
can be omitted. So, if you need to just repeat a code N times, that can be removed.Dude, there are at least 4 different “for” loop syntaxes in Js/Ts alone:
Also don’t forget ngFor and @for in html, and then the @for in sass/scss.
That’s 7 different for loops and I haven’t included the non-for loops, or even left Angular.
Once we include some scripting like I did just this week:
Then you can just stfu if I feel the need to remind myself of the exact syntax for one of the 3 or 4 different for loop options in c#.
Plot twist, the company app is written in a Lisp-like language.