Shira Anderson, an American international rights lawyer, is Meta’s AI policy chief who voluntarily enlisted for the IDF in 2009 under a program which enables non-Israeli Jews who aren’t eligible for military conscription to join the Israeli army.

With AI a critical emerging technology for tech giants and militaries, Anderson’s role at Meta is an important one. She develops the legal guidance, policies and public relations talking points concerning AI issues and regulation for all of Meta’s key areas, including its product, public policy and government affairs teams.

At Meta, Anderson, who is based in Meta’s Washington DC office, is in familiar company. More than one hundred former Israeli spies and IDF soldiers are employed by the company, my new investigation shows, many of whom worked for Israel’s spy agency Unit 8200.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes all occupiers are valid military targets but keep in mind that

      Meta’s AI policy chief who voluntarily enlisted for the IDF in 2009 under a program which enables non-Israeli Jews who aren’t eligible for military conscription to join the Israeli army.

      • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        You understand that you’re effectively arguing for targeting Israeli civilians with violence and advocating for genocide. You’re explicitly endorsing terrorism

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          You’re explicitly endorsing terrorism

          I am not endorsing Israel nor violence against civilians. I am endorsing the right of Palestinian armed resistance against occupation soldiers

              • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                5 days ago

                Active duty IDF soldiers? Or former IDF soldiers; because you’re trying to “out” former military Israeli civilians who happen to work for facebook.

                Do you believe that it is right to target any former member of the Israeli military, who is now a civilian, with violence?

                • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  The term reservist means the Israeli army can actively summon them for combat. As Israel has done for the genocide in Gaza.

                  Unless these soldiers decide to leave occupied Palestine they are not ex-soldiers because they are actively occupying and can be summoned for combat.

                  If you are talking about the ex-IDF soldiers at Facebook, they are not valid military targets if they are not occupying Palestine. Though they should face a court of law if they are using their position for Israel.

                  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Attacking reservists who are not activated violates the Geneva Convention and is nearly universally considered - including by Palestine, which has signed the Geneva Convention - to be a war crime.

                    This includes civilians - which deactivated reservists are - in occupied areas.

                    Ukraine is similarly not allowed to attack occupying Russians in Crimea who moved there after 2014, despite the fact all male Russians had military service.

                    Israel uses the exact same argumentation to kill “combat-aged” men - that is to say, male Palestinians who look 14 or older.

                    Also, being an occupying civilian during a conflict does not allow an opposing party to arrest them. They are afforded various protections, especially by the 4th Geneva Comvention.