cm0002@lemy.lol to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 15 hours agoReal programmer testlemy.lolimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11imageReal programmer testlemy.lolcm0002@lemy.lol to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 15 hours agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareKindaABigDyl@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·13 hours agoThe modern one: When there’s a function that can be written manually in 10 minutes but you find a way to do it in 10 days using LLMs
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 hours ago“Here’s my Claude skill that takes the LLM 20 minutes with constant babying that saves a human 1 minute of work” Promo time baby!
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·12 hours agoAnd the steps aren’t reproducible because the LLM does something different every time. So you can’t consistently recreate it.
minus-squareSleeplessCityLights@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 hours agoThat is my favorite way to notice my knob coworkers are sending me slop PRs. The same function written 3 different ways and all three have a different bugs.
The modern one:
“Here’s my Claude skill that takes the LLM 20 minutes with constant babying that saves a human 1 minute of work”
Promo time baby!
And the steps aren’t reproducible because the LLM does something different every time. So you can’t consistently recreate it.
That is my favorite way to notice my knob coworkers are sending me slop PRs. The same function written 3 different ways and all three have a different bugs.