Title is somewhat misleading. It’s not for anything video-related. It’s for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.
Title is somewhat misleading. It’s not for anything video-related. It’s for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.
Well it sounds like they took it down immediately so it was “resolved” but I guess that doesn’t undo the lost revenue.
From what I know, if they complied immediately, the plaintiff doesn’t really have a case