• workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They keep having to revise these numbers downward because they’re not accurate.

    Edit: August was revised down from 162,000 to 133,000. July was revised from +21000 to -10000. The September revision hasn’t been done yet.

    • BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yah, didn’t they revise 2025 job growth down by like 90%? No possible way to be off by that much without purposeful intention

        • BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Theres a reason donnie fired the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after job numbers revised downward

          Weird, huh?

          You legit think those numbers reported under donnies admin are real?

        • workerONE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That doesn’t really explain why the revisions are generally downwards. It just explains that there’s a preliminary estimate and then a final estimate and then a yearly comprehensive report. So why are you saying revisions are generally downwards because of the process? All I’m seeing is that when jobs are trending down, it’s hard to estimate the amount of jobs because we’re expecting a higher amount of jobs based on historical data, while the actual amount is trending down.