You have no sources, no points. You vaguely gesture to “atrocities” and “officials living above the law,” without any concrete examples. I give numerous facts and statistics, the blog post I linked is a compilation of peer reviewed studies and other metrics.
China isn’t free from negatives, the fact that I disagree with your blatant misconceptions like claiming China has no democracy doesn’t mean I don’t acknowledge their actual faults, such as the sluggish (but still positive) progress on implementing more LGBTQIA+ protections. I deny the absurdities you claim.
To answer your questions:
China is democratic, and I gave many sources from both China and western firms confirming it.
As answered in 1, China is democratic. I support democracy.
All in all, most people are receptive to what I have to say. You in particular opened with ableist attacks (that you keep repeating, I might add), dehumanization of me by comparing me to an LLM, and an utter refusal to engage with the points or sources I bring up. I doubt I’ll be able to convince you in particular, but I also doubt you’d listen to anyone that isn’t already repeating what you say.
This is straight out of another reality. Its like gish gallop in text form.
I don’t care to continue engaging though when your stance boils down to “believe my pushy, vague and hostile crazy shit with obviously misleading ‘evidence’ from my rhetoric trove or clearly you must be closed minded”
Anyone can “have evidence” when they copy pasta from their hives choice of choice readings. I’ve seen the storm front copypastas too. Was not convinced by them either.
All in all, most people are receptive to what I have to say.
Literally only within your echo chamber. Heard of the phrase preaching to the choir? Thats how you got that false confidence. Good luck expanding those numbers though.
Thank god you’re not most progressives. That would be unbearable. Its always wild when someone can from a distance appear to have opinions close to yours, but then you zoom in and they’re wild and deranged once you get to the reasoning and “what should we do to get there” parts.
You in particular opened with ableist attacks
This is just fucking hilarious. Super lazy weaponized civility here. Hey buddy! You calling me closed minded is aBlEiSt too! Because clearly crazy is a diagnosis not just a critical adjective of the accuracy of your perception.
You really do good engagement bait though, bot or no bot.
No, I mean most people, in real life and online, are receptive to the basic facts and sources I include. You even claim a Harvard-based study is “misleading evidence” when it affirms what I’m saying. If it sounds like it’s from a different reality, then that means that your current understanding is divorced from our reality.
Not sure why you’re doubling down on ableism and dehumanization. It’s incredibly easy to just not be ableist or dehumanize people.
You have no sources, no points. You vaguely gesture to “atrocities” and “officials living above the law,” without any concrete examples. I give numerous facts and statistics, the blog post I linked is a compilation of peer reviewed studies and other metrics.
TBF, on Reddit they never needed facts, studies, or evidence to browbeat and win fake internet points.
Fair, just felt it was important to highlight for them. They aren’t going to change their minds this time, but in the future when others keep showing them similar points because reality is oriented that way they may finally reconsider.
You’re so confidently incorrect. China does have voting and democratic structutes. They have the largest elections in the entire world. Further, they have eliminated absolute poverty, and year over year have steadily improved living conditions across the country.
You have no sources, no points. You vaguely gesture to “atrocities” and “officials living above the law,” without any concrete examples. I give numerous facts and statistics, the blog post I linked is a compilation of peer reviewed studies and other metrics.
China isn’t free from negatives, the fact that I disagree with your blatant misconceptions like claiming China has no democracy doesn’t mean I don’t acknowledge their actual faults, such as the sluggish (but still positive) progress on implementing more LGBTQIA+ protections. I deny the absurdities you claim.
To answer your questions:
China is democratic, and I gave many sources from both China and western firms confirming it.
As answered in 1, China is democratic. I support democracy.
All in all, most people are receptive to what I have to say. You in particular opened with ableist attacks (that you keep repeating, I might add), dehumanization of me by comparing me to an LLM, and an utter refusal to engage with the points or sources I bring up. I doubt I’ll be able to convince you in particular, but I also doubt you’d listen to anyone that isn’t already repeating what you say.
This is straight out of another reality. Its like gish gallop in text form.
I don’t care to continue engaging though when your stance boils down to “believe my pushy, vague and hostile crazy shit with obviously misleading ‘evidence’ from my rhetoric trove or clearly you must be closed minded”
Anyone can “have evidence” when they copy pasta from their hives choice of choice readings. I’ve seen the storm front copypastas too. Was not convinced by them either.
Literally only within your echo chamber. Heard of the phrase preaching to the choir? Thats how you got that false confidence. Good luck expanding those numbers though.
Thank god you’re not most progressives. That would be unbearable. Its always wild when someone can from a distance appear to have opinions close to yours, but then you zoom in and they’re wild and deranged once you get to the reasoning and “what should we do to get there” parts.
This is just fucking hilarious. Super lazy weaponized civility here. Hey buddy! You calling me closed minded is aBlEiSt too! Because clearly crazy is a diagnosis not just a critical adjective of the accuracy of your perception.
You really do good engagement bait though, bot or no bot.
No, I mean most people, in real life and online, are receptive to the basic facts and sources I include. You even claim a Harvard-based study is “misleading evidence” when it affirms what I’m saying. If it sounds like it’s from a different reality, then that means that your current understanding is divorced from our reality.
Not sure why you’re doubling down on ableism and dehumanization. It’s incredibly easy to just not be ableist or dehumanize people.
TBF, on Reddit they never needed facts, studies, or evidence to browbeat and win fake internet points.
Fair, just felt it was important to highlight for them. They aren’t going to change their minds this time, but in the future when others keep showing them similar points because reality is oriented that way they may finally reconsider.