Google is tightening control over Android under the guise of ‘security,’ but this crackdown on sideloading is a direct hit to digital sovereignty and FOSS. I’ve written about why this matters for our privacy and the future of open platforms. What do you think—is this the end of Android’s ‘open’ era?

  • gravitas@lem.ugh.im
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If a single company has this level of control over our devices we’ve already lost.

    Can you imagine a company like dell decided tomorrow to only allow installation from their specific vendor locked market? People would just not buy those products, you wouldn’t be demanding dell let you install linux, you just buy something else.

    Even if i had to use a pc that’s 10+ years old, id choose that over using a new pc that can only run vendor approved software. I cant imagine anything a new devive like a phone might have that would change my mind about it.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Can you imagine a company like dell decided tomorrow to only allow installation from their specific vendor locked market?

      TBH this possibility does scare me. That we could lose this freedom too on PC.

      Today already, most PC come with Microsoft’s secure boot keys in firmware. Microsoft signs the install keys for many Linux distros. It isn’t totally locked down, b/c you can turn this off in UEFI. But most of the pieces exist. Frog and pot…

      The PC platform is “open”, oh yes… but when Microsoft says jump, PC mfgs ask how high. We could somday see pressure to lock down all computing, not just mobile. To protect the children, you know…