• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Good. (Downvote me all you want)

    If you let everyone design their local traffic flow it will be impossible to go anywhere. That’s worse than everyone deciding if they want low-income housing or a safe injection site in their neighborhood.

    • potpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The intersection was already a 2-way stop and, given the street topology and level of service, changing it to an all-way stop is benign.

      The concern I have is that part of the charges include painting the crosswalk where one already exists. That’s not “design[ing] their local traffic flow,” but following up with expected public works. Granted he painted a ladder design rather than a standard continental pattern, but you should probably just shut the fuck up in the future.

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      A car-brained, embarrassing comment.

      The safety of children is more important than the speed you’re able to drive to Krispy Kreme Donuts. If the government doesn’t address it, the people will. You barking about traffic flow is irrelevant and I do not care.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, people also don’t want high-speed rail going past their house or whatever.

        If the government doesn’t address it, the people will.

        Good luck with that. Most people like cars a lot more than I do.