Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agofixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square1219fedilinkarrow-up1993arrow-down1165
arrow-up1828arrow-down1imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubVuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square1219fedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·1 year agoThis is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoLook up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t define axioms. It is the general definition commonly used, as recorded (but not decided) by the dictionary. Do you in fact have a different definition?
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoWords have the meaning we give them, not always just the original meaning
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoExactly. And the general meaning is the one I just gave.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-21 year agoBut general definition is not stable it changes. You’re just saying this in a way to negate my definition. Why do you get to define it?
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThe majority/community defines it has hasn’t changed it yet.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year agoSo you’re trying to say words have actual meanings?
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
Why do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
I don’t define axioms. It is the general definition commonly used, as recorded (but not decided) by the dictionary. Do you in fact have a different definition?
Words have the meaning we give them, not always just the original meaning
Exactly. And the general meaning is the one I just gave.
But general definition is not stable it changes. You’re just saying this in a way to negate my definition. Why do you get to define it?
The majority/community defines it has hasn’t changed it yet.
So you’re trying to say words have actual meanings?