The HELLDIVERS™©®³ 2 EULA is a god damn URL

  • fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    They can believe all they want. Unless it’s ruled and a precedent is set, the statement is false.

    I hope people stop believing they have that kind of power, but decide not to do it from the goodness of their heart or bad publicity.

    I should hope the actual law still has more relevance than a ToS.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Unless it’s ruled and a precedent is set, the statement is false.

      They believe that the users agreed to a contract that specifies that in any dealings with Disney they’ve agreed to binding arbitration.

      What’s the “false statement” there?

      • fluckx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        The fact the family can’t sue. They absolutely can (edit: in my opinion). Disney Lawyers believe they can’t ( edit: in their opinion). But wether or not they can is up to a judge in this case. And not up to Disney.

        So saying they can’t is false until there is actual clarity.

        Edit: that is my opinion of course