STOCKHOLM, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Vienna-based advocacy group NOYB on Wednesday said it has filed a complaint with the Austrian data protection authority against Mozilla accusing the Firefox browser maker of tracking user behaviour on websites without consent.

NOYB (None Of Your Business), the digital rights group founded by privacy activist Max Schrems, said Mozilla has enabled a so-called “privacy preserving attribution” feature that turned the browser into a tracking tool for websites without directly telling its users.

Mozilla had defended the feature, saying it wanted to help websites understand how their ads perform without collecting data about individual people. By offering what it called a non-invasive alternative to cross-site tracking, it hoped to significantly reduce collecting individual information.

  • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
    462·
    1 month ago

    And what else should be recommended?

    The choice is basically between Firefox or skinned Chromium.

    Do you really want to experience first-hand just why Internet Explorer was this hated?
    Here’s a hint: de facto monopoly on browser market that allowed them to control the web standards back then and their ideas were not good.

    it has become a sinking ship and I’m eager to see who picks up the shards and runs with it.

    I don’t think you have any idea how much work it takes to create a new browser.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      31·
      1 month ago

      Labybird is a completely new upcoming open source browser, complete with its own from scratch engine

      Theres also Servo an open source engine led by the Linux Foundation

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        3·
        1 month ago

        Ah yes, let’s recommend the browser that is “targeting a first Alpha release for early adopters in 2026.”

    • confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      517·
      1 month ago

      I think there’s kind of a 3rd choice, WebKit.

      Chrome was great, till it wasn’t. IE always was bad. Edge is chromium.

      Firefox has stayed closer to “don’t be evil” than many companies. Is say far more than the other options.

        • confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          12·
          1 month ago

          Completely agree. I understood WebKit to be a different browse engine than chromium or Firefox.

          While chromium and Firefox have wider platform options, there’s “kind of” a 3rd runner even though locked to apple.

          I agree Linux and open source is king.

      • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
        81·
        1 month ago

        I think there’s kind of a 3rd choice, WebKit.

        That’s where Chromium came from originally, so not really 3rd.

        • confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          52·
          1 month ago

          I was thinking WebKit was closer to Netscape in origin.

          You made me go look it up. 😉 and I think we’re both wrong…. (Here’s my edit…. Poster above is right. I read it wrong, so only I am wrong on the origin of WebKit)

          Below from Wikipedia:

          WebKit started as a fork of the KHTML and KJS software libraries from KDE.

          On April 3, 2013, Google announced that it had forked WebCore, a component of WebKit, to be used in future versions of Google Chrome