• protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Understood. One point though, a normally functioning AC unit is designed to run continuously during the hottest part of the day at the hottest part of the year. But I doubt the woman with a piss-house had an AC unit that was fully up to par

    • WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Fully agree with that lol. Regardless, when utilizing others properties for this sort of thing I’ve never seen the production use anything but what they owned to limit damages and possible lawsuits. I’m no expert on why, but I do know that’s how it is. Which makes sense from an investment point of view.

    • aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Running continuously with two people in the house and all doors and windows shut is still a completely different task than dozens of people, equipment that produces a shit ton of heat and doors constantly open because people come and go all the time.

        • protist@retrofed.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah this is what I was going to say, the AC doesn’t care what the temperature in the house actually is beyond when the thermostat tells it to turn on or off. Running continuously to maintain room temperature on a 100°F day will be the same to the unit whether the actual interior temp is 78° or 98°