He denies using a shock collar on his dog, but looking at the evidence gathered through old videos, still frames from new videos, and from people who personally interacted with the dog would suggest that to be a lie. I do not know if he still uses a shock collar on his dog since the latest controversy.
Tbh this is enough for me to doubt the validity of pretty much everything else you’ve said. If you’re so uncritical as to fall for this, what else will you fall for?
It also highlights that Hasan has been borderline, if not actually, abusive to his previous dog.
Probably not intentionally, mind you, as I think he believes he is using actual training tools and training for results that are reasonable, but what he believes does not change the fact that these are abusive (and ineffective) training methods.
Tbh this is enough for me to doubt the validity of pretty much everything else you’ve said. If you’re so uncritical as to fall for this, what else will you fall for?
That whole comment is clearly from an llm.
Can you give some substance other than your opinion?
Here’s one source that does bring evidence to the table to support the conclusion that Hasan used a shock collar.
It also highlights that Hasan has been borderline, if not actually, abusive to his previous dog.
Probably not intentionally, mind you, as I think he believes he is using actual training tools and training for results that are reasonable, but what he believes does not change the fact that these are abusive (and ineffective) training methods.