Just wondering as ive been told many os’s online and then told to not use certain one aswell, i feel confused on what linux os to try someday. i come from windows 10 and i always find i need windows on atleast 1 device, and put linux on the “outdated” devices, but i keep hoping around, i cant seem to make up my mind.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    @Grumpy404 Go for Linux Mint. You really need stability.
    So many Linux OSes are unstable and can take a very long time to repair.
    Linux Mint has the best hardware support while the underlying package manager
    is the most supported of the bunch and you can explore from there.

    For beginners stay away from these, from bad to worse:

    • Controversial distros, Ubuntu and Manjaro (unfortunately, because I had fun using this)
    • Breakaway distros, NixOS
    • Niche distros, Red Star Linux, Alpine Linux, PostmarketOS, Artix, Hannah Montana Linux
    • Downsized or Abandoned distros, Slackware, Knoppix, OpenMandriva
    • Build-up distros, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Linux from Scratch
    • Any GNU distros, Trisquel, Devuan, Parabola, Guix
  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If I’m forced to support it, Arch… It’s really not that difficult to use, and I’ll be damned if I have to remember all the Debian stuff 😂

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You’re gonna get “this is my favourite distro and this is why it should be just fine for any purpose including …what were we talking about again?”

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Ubuntu or Mint is quite okay, I have used both of them in the past and set it up for a friend with little money, little time, and very little PC expertise. Worked perfectly for them for over 10 years without a problem.

    Today, if you can get a little help with setting up, I’d recommend Debian stable with either GNOME or KDE. It is more stable and has longer and better long term security support, which did become more important.

    Also, it is now easy to set up with disk encryption, which matters for keeping private data secure on Laptops which can get lost or stolen.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s Mint for beginners. Or openSUSE Leap, but they keep depending on su instead of sudo, so newcomers will get confused with this.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    People keep saying Mint, and now that it runs on Wayland at least they will be able to watch a movie without screen tearing. But I do feel like KDE Plasma is a much better first impression, since it doesn’t look like a desktop from 2013 (no offense), and has so many customization options that showcase the freedom of a linix desktop.

    So for gamers, Bazzite, otherwise Fedora KDE or something

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      What’s so new about Plasma’s desktop paradigm? I would expect that about GNOME’s, but Plasma’s? It’s a polished and consistent UI, that it is.

      Also, customization in Plasma is overwhelming, and I know KDE since version 2.

  • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    To friends I usually recommend the distro I run myself, as I’m most familiar with it and troubleshoot it the best.

    If it’s someone who won’t get constant tech support from me, I’d probably go with Mint.

    As a power user Ubuntu sucks, but if you’ve never used Linux before it could also be a good starter distro. The vast amount of tutorials online are made for Ubuntu.

  • dt3@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    On older PCs use Linux mint but I don’t recommend it on newer PCs I have saw a lot of problems with them

  • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Debian based systems for systems you need more stable. Generally not a big concern for me unless you are setting up servers or really depend on specific software.

    I wouldn’t recommended Ubuntu, I would recommend something like mint if you’re going that route. But Ubuntu is a safe feeling first choice and i get why people chose it. If you google a problem and just add the word Ubuntu generally speaking the google result or even googles ai summary has got you covered pretty good.

    If you are more into gaming I would suggest something like bazzite, cachyos. Often they handle drivers for you super easily and comes with things like game scope too. Often you want more bleeding edge operating systems for gaming/newer hardware as updates seem to happen more frequently and with more noticeable improvements in the past 5 years.

    If you just need a basic computer the choice doesn’t really matter all that much its just kind of what looks good to you. You said its just for older computers so something like mint would be a fine choice in this scenario.

    Generally speaking you are either picking a arch based system or a Debian based system. And all the distros are kind of the same, they just give you preinstalled software, technically you can pick any and get the features you wanted yourself.

    Hopefully I didn’t confuse you more or give you too much decision paralysis.

  • Mordikan@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the best approach is to completely step out of Windows. Don’t use a desktop environment that is “Windows-esque”. Choose something that feels completely off the rails but fun/interesting.

    Arch seems intimidating? Try it out. Windows is all floating windows? Try tiling through hyprland. Don’t like the look of base hyprland? Rice it with caelestia or noctalia shells. Find the quirkiness that feels too good to pass up.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some people actually want their computer to just work, without having too much of a faff. For people like that something like Mint is a great option. If you have a lot of time and see mucking about with the computer as a hobby, installing Arch etc. can be fun. But for the rest of us it’s just not a sensible use of our time.

      • Mordikan@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        This has been an argument I’ve seen multiple times and I’ve never understood it. What specifically is taking more time to setup or configuration on Arch than on Mint?

        Between archinstall and the Mint installer it’s going through the exact same steps and questions. I’ve never seen an installation of Arch not “just work”. Genuinely curious about this.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think this is terrible advice lol. I switched to Kubuntu from Windows a while back and it’s been great. I even tried a Gnome based DE and hated it. Kubuntu just works. It was familiar then and continues to be familiar and practical.

      • Mordikan@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        To be fair, it’s not Kubuntu that’s familiar, it’s KDE that’s familiar.

        You can include KDE Plasma in your base install of Arch the same as Kubuntu.

        • Joelk111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          For sure, I was mostly balking at suggesting people new to Linux use weird DEs. I feel like starting with KDE is the way to go.