There is an advantage to this approach though: fewer errors. You’re plucking a known working command from a list instead of manually typing a (possibly) broken version of it. Worse yet is when it’s a command where typematic mistakes cause unintended side effects like data loss. So, mashing up 100 times can be pretty smart, especially if you’re not a great typist.
There is an advantage to this approach though: fewer errors. You’re plucking a known working command from a list instead of manually typing a (possibly) broken version of it. Worse yet is when it’s a command where typematic mistakes cause unintended side effects like data loss. So, mashing
up
100 times can be pretty smart, especially if you’re not a great typist.@dejected_warp_core That is true if you assume your history contains only working commands…
Oh no, I have to press
up
200+ times if we’re counting all the detritus and failure in my command history.