You’re a mess. Appealing to experience doesn’t work when you demonstrably have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’m criticizing your reasoning for not using Wayland. You claimed there were tons of issues, it was unpolished, etc. But when pressed, all you could do was point to GNOME. You couldn’t even define the problem until someone told you the term fractional scaling.
Then you told us in your own words that you wanted to stick with “XFCE” instead of “Wayland”. The former is a distro with both x11 and experimental Wayland support. The former is a series of protocols acting ad a compositor. Why would you compare them? Nobody who actually understands these technologies would compare them.
That leads me to the reason for my vigor: you’re making shit up to justify your stubbornness. Which doesn’t need justifying. Just say you’re stubborn without all the bullshit and you won’t look so silly.
I’m literally reading your posts and responding to your words.
The real issue is that even today, some apps (Firefox, gedit, some terminals) don’t adjust their scaling to the new screen
This shows you dont know what fractional scaling is otherwise you would have used the term.
I work in Linux as a daily driver for work and personal. I don’t care what the tools are, but they need to work and stay out of the way. Right now, Wayland implementation of multi monitor for my hardware is too much bother, I’ll try it again in a year.
This is you being stubborn because you’re justifying your inaction based on false manufactured premises.
I have no objections to Wayland itself, but I value the kind of stability xfce gives me, which is stable, predictable, and gets out of the way. Right now, on my hardware, Wayland/gnome is not there.
This shows you don’t understand what Wayland is because you compared a compositor protocol to a desktop environment.
You’re a mess. Appealing to experience doesn’t work when you demonstrably have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’m criticizing your reasoning for not using Wayland. You claimed there were tons of issues, it was unpolished, etc. But when pressed, all you could do was point to GNOME. You couldn’t even define the problem until someone told you the term fractional scaling.
Then you told us in your own words that you wanted to stick with “XFCE” instead of “Wayland”. The former is a distro with both x11 and experimental Wayland support. The former is a series of protocols acting ad a compositor. Why would you compare them? Nobody who actually understands these technologies would compare them.
That leads me to the reason for my vigor: you’re making shit up to justify your stubbornness. Which doesn’t need justifying. Just say you’re stubborn without all the bullshit and you won’t look so silly.
I thought you read my posts. You didn’t see that I use both Wayland and x11?
Go away.
I’m literally reading your posts and responding to your words.
This shows you dont know what fractional scaling is otherwise you would have used the term.
This is you being stubborn because you’re justifying your inaction based on false manufactured premises.
This shows you don’t understand what Wayland is because you compared a compositor protocol to a desktop environment.
xfce isn’t a distro, it’s a desktop environment
very funny that you’re so aggro when you clearly have no fucking idea what you’re talking about
lol, they edited it