Nah dude, I knew for sure it was AI before I ever checked Pangram. There’s examples of me catching AIs in the wild on social media from 4 years ago even — been at this longer than Pangram was around.
No human would have written those last two lines that way.
That cadence is almost as much of a signature for the Claudes as “it’s not X — it’s Y” was for ChatGPTs.
It’s hilarious to me that no one here so far realizes the copy of the post itself was written by AI.
“the copy of the post itself” wtf are you talking about? What copy?
The writing. The words on the images. ‘Copywriting’
I’m assuming you pulled the image from elsewhere, but it’s clearly been written by AI. I knew it even before I bothered checking.
The last two lines are a very particular way of phrasing it. In fact, I can tell it was a Claude that wrote them.
So your AI told you what to think and now you dismiss any words that are written.
Maybe your AI is wrong? “Confidence limited - short text”
Maybe you should click that learn more before you listen to your AI’s hallucinations
Nah dude, I knew for sure it was AI before I ever checked Pangram. There’s examples of me catching AIs in the wild on social media from 4 years ago even — been at this longer than Pangram was around.
No human would have written those last two lines that way.
That cadence is almost as much of a signature for the Claudes as “it’s not X — it’s Y” was for ChatGPTs.