They met at a bar in midtown Manhattan. He arrived wearing a baseball cap pulled low and sported a pair of black-framed glasses, she says. As conversation flowed, from discussions about navigating life in New York to past relationships, he mentioned that his glasses were Meta Ray-Bans.

“I wasn’t familiar with them,” McAnuff, a 28-year-old project manager who now lives in Toronto, tells WIRED. It was her first time seeing the smart glasses up close, which can record images and video from the wearer’s viewpoint. He let her try them on and even showed her a couple of videos that he’d taken previously, she says. “That was it. We stopped talking about it after that. I figured that was the end of the use.”

The next day, checking her Instagram, McAnuff noticed she’d been tagged in one of his story posts. To her surprise, it was footage of them at the bar and on the subway together, en route to a basketball game uptown. In the video, McAnuff is captured from an above angle, sitting across from her date who is holding a drinking glass; WIRED has seen screenshots of the footage. “I felt super violated,” McAnuff says. “Like, what if I don’t want everyone knowing what I’m up to? He felt so free to film me and post it. There was no conversation about it.”

Meta sold more than 7 million pairs of the Ray-Bans in 2025, as its smart glasses have infiltrated public spaces thanks to pranksters with dreams of viral fame, some of whom even film people while they’re at work. The phenomenon, which has also spread to pickup artists hitting on women, has earned the hardware the nickname “creep glasses.”

Among singles, and particularly women, Meta’s AI-powered eyewear has become a recurring nuisance, as people share a spreading unease about being covertly filmed on dates.

  • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    If there were a lot of cases where women were murdering people after eating cereal, no, it would not be strange to see an article talking about the prevalence and the why behind the phenomenon.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Does it examine why men are doing it, and women arent? I didn’t see that. There is one line about reviewing the “game tape” looking to improve, but that’s all I noticed.

      • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Gary Lewandowski, a psychology professor at Monmouth University whose research focuses on the science of romantic connection, says adding covert cameras to the mix will only make building trust harder. He says beyond posting for the ’gram, a number of factors could be driving men to do this. The most logical, non-creepy reason may be tied to post-date analysis, in that the glasses can help men identify blind spots around their own behavior.

        “A lot of men out there are eternal optimizers. They want better, more efficient ways of doing things, so reviewing game tape allows them to learn from mistakes,” Lewandowski says. “But I do wonder if some are doing it to build a case instead of a connection—why they’re right and the other person is wrong—or to help better identify red flags.” That type of surveillance “makes the date less about getting to know each other and more about fact gathering,” he adds.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s the part. That’s all I saw about why.

          The rest is about how recording people without their consent is bad, and these glasses make it easy…

          • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            As anxieties over surveillance tech grow, unsuspecting singles are sharing stories of being covertly filmed on dates by Meta smart glasses.

            The article is very upfront about what it contains - anecdotal stories from people who have been filmed while on dates. They all are women that were filmed by men.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              “Anecdotal stories from people who have been filmed while on dates” would have been a better title.

                • Steve@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  “As anxieties over surveillance tech grow, unsuspecting singles are sharing stories of being covertly filmed on dates by Meta smart glasses.”

                  That’s literally the subtitle. And it would work just as well with better the title you wrote.

                  • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Yeah I quoted the literal subtitle in my comment:

                    As anxieties over surveillance tech grow, unsuspecting singles are sharing stories of being covertly filmed on dates by Meta smart glasses.

                    The article is very upfront about what it contains - anecdotal stories from people who have been filmed while on dates. They all are women that were filmed by men.

          • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            The rest is about how recording people without their consent is bad, and these glasses make it easy…

            Yes and guess the type of person who is overwhelmingly abusing the glasses and recording without people’s consent. Take a wild guess.

      • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        This one talks about teen boys using these smart glasses to record girls in their middle and high schools

        The video has the distinctive style of the invasive “rizzcam” and other “POV” videos in which self-styled “pickup artists” and other online creators use smart glasses to record themselves harassing women at malls and boardwalks or pestering employees at their place of work for content. But the people in this video aren’t adults. Everyone in the clip — the girl, the boy filming, and hallway passersby — is a teenage student.

        A Futurism review found large numbers of videos recorded at middle and high schools using smart glasses — almost always Meta’s AI Glasses, designed in partnership with the eyewear titan Ray-Ban — and shared to social media platforms TikTok and Instagram. Recordings take place in school hallways, cafeterias, and classrooms, and feature interactions with other students as well as with staff and faculty.

        Much of the behavior on display is plainly harassment and bullying, often filmed without the subjects’ knowledge or consent and uploaded online to humiliate them further. Strikingly, every single one of the many smart glasses videos we found were captured by teen boys — and their bad behavior was overwhelmingly directed at girls.

          • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            This one’s title is “Teen Boys Are Using Meta Glasses to Harass and Bully Girls at High Schools and Middle Schools”

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s a better title. It’s directly mentioning a specific thing. It’s not moralizing that thing, or implying anything about it.

      • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Here’s another article talking about the prevalence of men using these glasses to secretly record women.

        Zanjani’s experience is the tip of the iceberg. There are entire accounts dedicated to this type of “pick-up artist” content: men whose shtick is stopping women in the street and chatting them up, with the exchange covertly captured on sophisticated smart glasses, such as Meta’s Ray-Bans, and then shared on social media.

        The latter two women were both secretly filmed by an American content creator who goes by the name “itspolokidd”. He has 1.6 million followers on Instagram; the content is exclusively videos of him hitting on women in public places. Sometimes the women seem unfazed; sometimes they are unsettled by his full-on approach (he often walks up to them and calls them sexy or beautiful, then starts referring to them as his future wife or the future mother of his children). Even when his behaviour isn’t apparently distressing for the women involved, there is no escape from the comments on his videos, which can range from insulting to sexist to lascivious. In one itspolokidd video, the woman being filmed is standing with a friend, another woman with a shaved head. “What on EARTH is THAT next to her?!” reads one of the multiple derogatory comments.

        There are already confirmed cases in which smart glasses have been used illegally. On 6 January, David Williams, 47, pleaded guilty to voyeurism at Warrington Magistrates’ Court after he’d recorded sex with a woman without her explicit consent using a pair of smart glasses. Williams swerved jail and was instead fined £800 and ordered to pay a £320 surcharge and court costs of £85, reported The Telegraph.

        But even in the less obviously harmful cases, the End Violence Against Women coalition (EVAW) has flagged other potential safety issues connected to women being non-consensually filmed. Specifically, when the footage of them shared online includes their personal details, such as their location or phone number, says Rebecca Hitchen, head of policy and campaigns. “The safety risks of this are huge, as is the subsequent level of harassment, trolling and doxxing many are subjected to when videos are posted online.”

          • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Here’s another one, this time from BBC:

            Women leaving the beach, going into a shop, or simply standing outside are now being approached by men usually wearing Meta’s Ray-Bans, the company’s “smart” or “AI” glasses, often in order to film the women’s responses to casual questions or pick-up lines without their knowledge or consent.

            The women only find out about the videos of them after they gain traction, and often abuse, online. They have little legal recourse as photography in public is broadly considered legal. One woman told the BBC that when she asked the person who posted a secret recording of her to remove it, she was told that doing so was “a paid service”.

            Meta’s glasses are currently the most popular on the market, estimated to make up more than 80% of all AI or smart glasses sales, as the company was the first major tech player to launch such a product in recent years.

            Made in partnership with EssilorLuxottica and offering the classic look of Ray-Bans, the glasses feature an almost invisible camera in the frames, small speakers in the arms, and in the latest version lenses that can show a wearer some information. People can start recording video or take a photo with a casual touch of the frames.

            The nature of the camera in Meta’s glasses can be so unobtrusive that even their wearers have been caught off guard by what and when they’re recording, and where those recordings are going.

              • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s backing up the Wired’s title by showing that is predominantly men who are using these glasses to film women without their consent.

                • Steve@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  But men doing it more often isn’t the problem with Wired’s title. It’s that Wired’s title implies it’s only a problem when men do it. Or more specifically, only a problem when men do it with Meta’s glasses.

                  • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Men who wear smart glasses on dates are a red flag.

                    I really don’t know why you’re so confused by that statement.

          • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            This article is part of a larger conversation about smart glasses, privacy concerns, and how people are using them.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sure. I have no problem with the article or larger public conversation. The title is sensationalized with sexism, and a fad device. Which is what I tried to spark this conversation about.

              • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s not sensationalized when it’s the truth. Men who wear these smart glasses on dates are a red flag.

                Here’s another article, this one is from 404 Media:

                The researchers compiled a dataset of 350 Instagram videos posted between September 2023 and March 2026. The videos fit specific criteria: they depicted real-world interactions involving unsolicited approaches to women in public or semi-public settings. “Unsolicited interactions were defined as approaches that appeared to be initiated without prior indication of mutual engagement,” the researchers wrote in the paper. “We included videos that appeared to be staged, scripted, or comedic performance as it is often difficult to confidently determine intent in platform content, and such material may still contribute to the circulation and normalisation of these interactions.” They found the videos by searching hashtags and keywords commonly used by pickup artist grifters.

                The more surreptitious the filming seemed, the researchers found, the more serious the harassment. “The data reveals a clear correlation between the ‘covertness’ of the filming modality and the severity of the harassment,” they wrote. “This combination of first-person perspective and device concealment confirms that the means of production remain largely clandestine, facilitating a condition of low awareness among subjects and reinforcing the deceptive nature of wearable-mediated capture.”

                • Steve@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It’s only sensationalizing when it’s the truth. If it’s not the truth it’s lying. And that a whole different thing.