• GiveOver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are you actually trying to say though? The sentence ostensibly compares two values. “Number of times you’ve been to Berlin” vs “Amount of people who’ve been to Berlin”. You can’t compare those two. As a maths teacher would say, you’re mixing your units.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I feel like the sentence is trying to communicate

      • I have never been to Berlin
      • many people have been to Berlin
      • i am in the minority, having not been to Berlin.

      This relies on some illusionary filling in the gaps.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Exactly. It is an ambiguous sentence. The interesting thing for me is how I could read it and not realize it was ambiguous because of my brain trying to fill in the gaps and understand what the other person was trying to say.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Huh, oh i see what you’re saying now.

      If I’ve never been to Berlin, than the number of people who have been to Berlin is greater than the number of me.

      Where P = number of people who have been to Berlin.

      Me = number of me, who hasn’t been to Berlin = 1

      P > 1.

      It seems like what you’re saying is that this sentence either obvious on its face, because Berlin is a major City that plenty of people have obviously been to, or ambiguous that it is comparing the number of times I’ve been to Berlin to something undefined. I would agree that on closer inspection, the question is ambiguous!

      I would also say that P is also implicitly context dependent, in other undefined ways. Perhaps i mean that there are other people in my situation who have been to Berlin, where i have not.

      One underlying assumption I’m discovering through this discussion is that to me, the sentence implies that the speaker has been to Berlin zero times. But on closer inspection, that isn’t the only way to read it. In a context where it wasn’t clear if the speaker had been to Berlin or not, it would make much less sense.

      Have you heard of the book “thinking fast and slow?” by kahneman? I’m not sure how rigorous the science is, but it has other examples of sentences that people will interpret incorrectly if they aren’t thinking carefully, because of the way that brains make unconscious assumptions to save energy and try not to think that hard.

      Some examples are, “What do Cows drink?” people who have to answer quickly without thought tend to say milk.

      Another:

      (1) A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball.

      How much does the ball cost? _____ cents

      Most people answering quickly say $0.10