then my neighbor is gonna have an interesting conversation with the cops about how much illegal drugs he’s been ordering over the internet. Geez man, that’s not even a reasonable argument, nobody has an open wifi, it’s not 2001 anymore.
I have heard that some vendors support joining adhoc networks with others of the same brand. So if you have an LG TV (as an example) that you dont connect to the internet, but your neighbor has one that is connected, they could theoretically link up and bridge the unconnected one.
To be fair, this would have to be functionality included in the factory, and may not actually be a thing. But I remember reading something about it with LGs a few years ago, and it stuck with me.
Even if that wasn’t a thing yet, WiFi chips can be bought for less than $1 each in bulk now, and companies can put a monetary value on one person’s private data in the range of $1000 and up, so schemes like that are inevitabilities.
I used to look forward to global Internet coverage. While I still think it’s overall a good thing, I fear the day it’s ubiquitous and reliable enough that electronics are widely built to connect to it automatically without fallbacks or user input and make it nigh impossible to disable while keeping the device functional. We seem to be getting there sooner rather than later. I definitely feel less guilty about hoarding older hardware now.
Yeah but those are only 2.4 ghz so they reach to your neighbors xfinity hotspot at a meager 150 mbps. Not nearly fast enough to exfiltrate the real time retina scans that skynet will need. Also, they are not less than a dollar in bulk.
It has no way of sending any recordings if you don’t connect it to the Internet.
But what if
then my neighbor is gonna have an interesting conversation with the cops about how much illegal drugs he’s been ordering over the internet. Geez man, that’s not even a reasonable argument, nobody has an open wifi, it’s not 2001 anymore.
If you have an open guest network you can just say you don’t know who it was when your IP has been used for something illegal tho?
I have heard that some vendors support joining adhoc networks with others of the same brand. So if you have an LG TV (as an example) that you dont connect to the internet, but your neighbor has one that is connected, they could theoretically link up and bridge the unconnected one.
To be fair, this would have to be functionality included in the factory, and may not actually be a thing. But I remember reading something about it with LGs a few years ago, and it stuck with me.
Even if that wasn’t a thing yet, WiFi chips can be bought for less than $1 each in bulk now, and companies can put a monetary value on one person’s private data in the range of $1000 and up, so schemes like that are inevitabilities.
I used to look forward to global Internet coverage. While I still think it’s overall a good thing, I fear the day it’s ubiquitous and reliable enough that electronics are widely built to connect to it automatically without fallbacks or user input and make it nigh impossible to disable while keeping the device functional. We seem to be getting there sooner rather than later. I definitely feel less guilty about hoarding older hardware now.
Yeah but those are only 2.4 ghz so they reach to your neighbors xfinity hotspot at a meager 150 mbps. Not nearly fast enough to exfiltrate the real time retina scans that skynet will need. Also, they are not less than a dollar in bulk.
https://www.mouser.com/en/ProductDetail/Espressif-Systems/ESP32-C3?qs=iLbezkQI%252BsiMXe7tMG%252Bo%2FA%3D%3D
They are exactly a dollar 😁
I’m fairly sure that is a thing.
What about LTE. I didn’t connect my new car to the internet. They did. 🙃