Possibly linux@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agoYou guys fell for clickbaitlemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square205linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11external-linkYou guys fell for clickbaitlemmy.zipPossibly linux@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square205linkfedilink
minus-squarehendu@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoIdeally, we wouldn’t need to do age verification at all. But if it’s absolutely required, the most privacy-preserving way would be: System administrator verifies the birthdate of the user, stores it on the user account Applications can then ask, “is the current user over 18?” And just gets true/false.
minus-squareMrQuallzin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days ago But if it’s absolutely required It’s not.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days ago Applications can then ask, “is the current user over 18?” And just gets true/false. the current implementation allows reading the precise age
Ideally, we wouldn’t need to do age verification at all. But if it’s absolutely required, the most privacy-preserving way would be:
It’s not.
the current implementation allows reading the precise age