• DaGeek247@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    i think society in general just gets the ick from the idea of people consenting to things being done to their body that they personally dont understand or would never want and tries to stop it to satisfy their own feelings. we see this applied to all kinds of things like abortion, body modification, drug use, suicide, gender transition, sex acts, sexual partners, etc.

    These are not all the same thing. Drug use costs society, not just the drug user. Bridge/train jumpers are some of the most selfish people out there; forcing your suicide onto an unrelated driver is the epitome of an asshole move.

    Your body your choice is right, but that stops right at the line where it crosses over into other peoples lives.

    My point being, duels to the death very easy to argue against simply because of the societal cost of managing them, while completely ignoring any so called ‘ick factor’ it may or may not have on the majority of people.

    Would you be one the people to sign up for body cleaning duty? Would you be happy paying taxes for the dueling arena where it is impossible to prove that there was consent the whole time, every time?

    • applebusch (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      all of the negatives youre talking about are because society prevents people from ending their lives or taking drugs or dueling each other in convenient and responsible places/ways. if we gave people the right to end their lives gracefully, in proximity to services to deal with their body after the fact, train jumpers wouldnt be a thing. youre just seeing the harm i was talking about and ascribing it to the act itself.

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Uh huh. And who pays for the medical bills after someone gets shot in the spine and decides they no longer want to ‘consent’ to this farce of an idea?