fossilesque@mander.xyz to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 days agoRobobert?mander.xyzimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up11
arrow-up11imageRobobert?mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareadeoxymus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoMore important is the scale. On a scale of 10 means it doesn’t matter in what base XD
minus-squareCanadaPlus@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoSo then in binary this would mean a decimal 5?
minus-squareadeoxymus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoDepends if the scale runs from 1 to 10 it would be equivalent to a decimal 1, interpretation would be binary: 10 pretty 1 not pretty
minus-squareCanadaPlus@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoNot zero-indexing people’s attractiveness SMH. /s
minus-squareredparadise@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoOn a scale of 10, 10 in Base 2 would be 2.
More important is the scale. On a scale of 10 means it doesn’t matter in what base XD
So then in binary this would mean a decimal 5?
Depends if the scale runs from 1 to 10 it would be equivalent to a decimal 1, interpretation would be binary: 10 pretty 1 not pretty
Not zero-indexing people’s attractiveness SMH. /s
On a scale of 10, 10 in Base 2 would be 2.