• Ignotum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    For text, if you have a decent probability distribution of the next piece of text based on the past context, then you can create a much more efficient encoding, so in that case you can create a good lossless compression
    decompression would be terribly slow though, and it doesn’t easily extend to images

    Are people downvoting just because LLM? It’s basic information theory, i’m not suggesting we start using it, it would be slow to the point of uselessness

    • Tonuka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      To be clear I’m not speculating on something that could potentially be cool, this already exists and is improving

      • Ignotum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah i was just pointing out one case where it can be used for lossless compression, for lossy compression you can use autoencoders and stuff, but they are lossy and less efficient than jpeg and the like