• crow@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is that? It’s not like PDF’s are new. If it’s licensing are there non-legal PDF editors that work well?

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wasn’t PDF supposed to be a read-only, print-only medium? You’re supposed to edit the source material (like a doc) and export that to PDF, not edit PDF directly.

    • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, there’s Acrobat. I think that the issue is that PDF is a deceptively complicated format. It’s basically a programming language for describing pages to print. So it’s not like parsing a JPG or something, you need a PDF interpreter. And I imagine the Adobe one is encumbered.

      • hstde@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably the same reason it takes so long to come up with third party flash interpreters.

        I mean flash isn’t exactly new, but for the longest time there was only Adobe flash.