Yeah, Kamala, the candidate who had the entire DNC apparatus working all the tricks of the trade in order for her to get the nomination, that one. What makes you think the next candidate won’t also be a ghoul?
Because no one could possibly be as poor a candidate as Kamala. You make it sound like a neoliberal conspiracy…what I remember was desperation and incompetence.
Once again. Your reasoning is why I am fully prepared to have Trump’s entire family run the country for a couple decades, give Israel open reign to do whatever they want, and for a bunch of non-voters pretending to care about Palestinians continue to sabotage themselves.
70% of Democrats want to stop funding Israel. Trump fights Benjamin Netanyahu’s wars for him. But they are exactly the same.
How can you compare anyone to Kamala, a person who has never held real power. I can’t tell you if Newsome would be better than a fictional Kamala presidency, but I can say with certainty: millions of lives a year throughout the world would be saved if Newsome was president instead of Trump. But somehow they are all the same. It’s a ridiculous premise.
Because I saw enough Newsome interviews to see how much of a terrible politicians he is with zero convictions and not being even able to hide that fact
Because no one could possibly be as poor a candidate as Kamala.
Which dems have sufficiently different positions on foreign affairs?
70% of Democrats want to stop funding Israel. Trump fights Benjamin Netanyahu’s wars for him. But they are exactly the same.
USian dems have always been zionist, and they were no less enthusiastic about this than the current USian administration.
What are these mythical dems that supposedly want to stop applying Pissrael?
I have no idea what your cute nicknames are referring to. Sufficiently different opinion? Literally everyone who didn’t want to go to war for Benjamin Netanyahu…which is everyone but Trump. Or how about anyone not dumb enough to send their son in law to solve middle easy peace. Night and day difference to anyone paying attention.
Biden-Harris administration was very willing to go to that ‘war’ (i.e. the genocide). Last I checked, they were not Trump.
Also, why single out Netanyahu? Do you think that the genocide started with him, or that other parts of the Pissraeli government somehow don’t support the genocide?
It was under Biden that the US supported Israel in ramping up to the current stage of genocide in Palestine and expansionism into Lebanon. It was also Kamala who called Iran the greatest threat to America when she was running last time. They very clearly were more than happy to support Benjamin, odds are they would simply have been more competent in how they went about it.
Kamala ran on having the same policies as Biden. What makes you think the next one won’t?
Kamala? The candidate picked by Biden and no one else had the same views as Biden? Wow!
Yeah, Kamala, the candidate who had the entire DNC apparatus working all the tricks of the trade in order for her to get the nomination, that one. What makes you think the next candidate won’t also be a ghoul?
Because no one could possibly be as poor a candidate as Kamala. You make it sound like a neoliberal conspiracy…what I remember was desperation and incompetence.
Once again. Your reasoning is why I am fully prepared to have Trump’s entire family run the country for a couple decades, give Israel open reign to do whatever they want, and for a bunch of non-voters pretending to care about Palestinians continue to sabotage themselves.
70% of Democrats want to stop funding Israel. Trump fights Benjamin Netanyahu’s wars for him. But they are exactly the same.
Newsome would be as bad as Kamala
How can you compare anyone to Kamala, a person who has never held real power. I can’t tell you if Newsome would be better than a fictional Kamala presidency, but I can say with certainty: millions of lives a year throughout the world would be saved if Newsome was president instead of Trump. But somehow they are all the same. It’s a ridiculous premise.
Because I saw enough Newsome interviews to see how much of a terrible politicians he is with zero convictions and not being even able to hide that fact
Which dems have sufficiently different positions on foreign affairs?
USian dems have always been zionist, and they were no less enthusiastic about this than the current USian administration.
What are these mythical dems that supposedly want to stop applying Pissrael?
I have no idea what your cute nicknames are referring to. Sufficiently different opinion? Literally everyone who didn’t want to go to war for Benjamin Netanyahu…which is everyone but Trump. Or how about anyone not dumb enough to send their son in law to solve middle easy peace. Night and day difference to anyone paying attention.
Biden-Harris administration was very willing to go to that ‘war’ (i.e. the genocide). Last I checked, they were not Trump.
Also, why single out Netanyahu? Do you think that the genocide started with him, or that other parts of the Pissraeli government somehow don’t support the genocide?
What are you talking about? What war? You just make shit up. That is why MAGA will be around for a while. Facts are irrelevant.
??? You yourself called the genocide a “war”.
Here are your own words:
Not the original person you were talking to.
It was under Biden that the US supported Israel in ramping up to the current stage of genocide in Palestine and expansionism into Lebanon. It was also Kamala who called Iran the greatest threat to America when she was running last time. They very clearly were more than happy to support Benjamin, odds are they would simply have been more competent in how they went about it.
Project much?