• LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It really needs to have the panels expanded. Each panel should also have a “domestic child crushing machine” and the D one would not be going and the R would be crushing away.

      That’s way more accurate to the real world.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        “It should clarify that the lives of foreign children don’t matter compared to domestic ones!”

      • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The dems are also running a domestic child crusher. You people just don’t notice or care until a republican is in charge.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Look I’m not saying Dems are awesome, in fact I would say when it comes to foreign policy them and Republicans are pretty aligned. Behaving like there hasn’t been huge differences in policy, legislation, enforcement priorities, regulation, education and healthcare spending between Democratic and Republican majorities in Congress and/or President is insane though. Like just head in the sand ignoring reality levels of crazy.

          • AviAdi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Buddy, i live in California and vote left of demo when possible. The Dems here actually want the status quo of homeless children as long as property values keep going up. Insanity

          • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sweet. Ableism. Funny how you types resort to it so easily.

            Behaving like there is some huge difference between them is what is “head in the sand crazy.” The reasons for this observation have been listed throughout this thread, yet oddly enough none of you people manage to engage with any of the many comments giving explicit examples, nor do you manage to engage with any of the comments detailing the worldview. Which is odd. Its almost like you’re just here to argue and dont actually care about this at all.
            Or maybe you just can’t handle investigating your own ideology or the faulty notions you hold.

    • ClathrateG [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      How is it a strawman? Liberals will and do vote for a party operating the foreign child crusher, if that party has more decorum and civility that the other party that would operate the foreign child crusher

    • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here’s the non strawman version of the top panel:

      “I will operate the foreign child crusher in a way which will perhaps lead to less foreign children being crushed. What’s that? Dismantle the child crusher? This is not politically feasible you should be more reasonable.”

    • Salamence@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      you didn’t even bait it

      Idk, looking at the votes and comments i think i bait it pretty good