Karna@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 days agoWayland Found To Be "Intrinsically Faster Than X11, But Not Necessarily More Efficient"www.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up11file-text
arrow-up11external-linkWayland Found To Be "Intrinsically Faster Than X11, But Not Necessarily More Efficient"www.phoronix.comKarna@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 days agomessage-square22linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-square1984@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoIt’s better. Much better. If Linux desktops was still on X, it would feel and be incredibly dated. I know it works “fine” but has many limitations, which is why we needed Wayland in the first place.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoThere has been a lot of reintroduce X issue because we discovered why they did it. But I don’t think there’s an argument to not use Wayland if you’re able to.
It’s better. Much better. If Linux desktops was still on X, it would feel and be incredibly dated. I know it works “fine” but has many limitations, which is why we needed Wayland in the first place.
There has been a lot of reintroduce X issue because we discovered why they did it.
But I don’t think there’s an argument to not use Wayland if you’re able to.