- every AP’s BSSID your phone sees is sniffed by a program running continuously in the background, mapped to a latitude/longitude if possible (via GPS or any phone location means) and sent to their servers,
- So that other devices can send a list of AP BSSIDs and signal strengths and get a triangulated location within 5-10 meters.
So the server ends up with a global database of AP locations, and also the location of every device in the world using the service within ~5-10 meters.
Situation seems muddled. Article claims its opt-in, but who knows, I don’t put much trust in claims like that. The idea of a local service to reduce power reqs of a GPS radio seems OK. But this allegedly sends loc data back to Qualcomm, which seems unnecessary. Mfgs like to muddle everything up so features you want, get tied to things you don’t.
Qualcomm has its “IZat” system where:
- every AP’s BSSID your phone sees is sniffed by a program running continuously in the background, mapped to a latitude/longitude if possible (via GPS or any phone location means) and sent to their servers,
- So that other devices can send a list of AP BSSIDs and signal strengths and get a triangulated location within 5-10 meters.
So the server ends up with a global database of AP locations, and also the location of every device in the world using the service within ~5-10 meters.
They’ve had this in action since 2012.
Article about -> https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2023/04/27/are-qualcomm-chips-snooping-on-you-no-not-quite/1100433
Situation seems muddled. Article claims its opt-in, but who knows, I don’t put much trust in claims like that. The idea of a local service to reduce power reqs of a GPS radio seems OK. But this allegedly sends loc data back to Qualcomm, which seems unnecessary. Mfgs like to muddle everything up so features you want, get tied to things you don’t.
Faraday pouches are our friend.