Right now, currently. Not a year ago. And if a one man’s action cannot be considered revolutionary, much less whatever OP thinks they are doing. Or you for all that matters.
Groups like the Party for Socialism and Liberation are at the forefront of salient political organizing in the US, and are growing constantly. I think we should join orgs like it and expand the organizing of the working classes.
I agree with you and believe that it is a great action. It is not revolutionary, that’s the whole point. It might lead to a revolution down the line, still.
Let’s say the party dissolves today and the members stop being politically active. Could any action of the party up until today be considered revolutionary?
Remember, I am not saying organization is wrong or unnecessary, just that organizing at a time where is completely legal is not revolutionary in itself.
Right now, currently. Not a year ago. And if a one man’s action cannot be considered revolutionary, much less whatever OP thinks they are doing. Or you for all that matters.
The point was that you clearly don’t know anything about revolutions
Well then, show me about the revolution you are carrying out right now.
No officer, I don’t think I will.
Groups like the Party for Socialism and Liberation are at the forefront of salient political organizing in the US, and are growing constantly. I think we should join orgs like it and expand the organizing of the working classes.
I agree with you and believe that it is a great action. It is not revolutionary, that’s the whole point. It might lead to a revolution down the line, still.
How is organizing, which is critical for revolution in the first place, not revolutionary? Weren’t you saying adventurism was revolutionary earlier?
A political party is organizing too. The organization is a great step, but is not revolutionary in itself. Not nowadays, it was in the past, though.
Organizing in a revolutionary political party is revolutionary, because it actually does advance the class struggle.
Let’s say the party dissolves today and the members stop being politically active. Could any action of the party up until today be considered revolutionary?
Remember, I am not saying organization is wrong or unnecessary, just that organizing at a time where is completely legal is not revolutionary in itself.