Like, we all know they’re listening , but can we provide proof?

My friend was complaining about all the new super surveillance that will be government required in cars after 2027, and I said to him dude you have a stock android, you use every AI slop feature, you use a smart TV on your unsecured network, and uses x every day. They have everything they could possibly need on him. Oh and he posts questionable things to fb daily under his real name.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not logically sound, but at this point the burden of proof needs to be on Big Tech if they want to claim they’re not spying. Otherwise we’d have to prove it for each individual model, and that isn’t feasible, and only supports the opposition.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I saw proof one day. I was visiting a welding shop on business, never been there before, didn’t know them. At some point, I’m sitting in the office with about five guys, distracting them from their work, yakking, and I mention a big piece of gear I have to haul around using a cart. One suggests a different kind of cart, and describes it. As we’re talking, one of the other guys gasps, and holds his phone up to show the boss.

    While we were talking, this guy opened his phone, and the first ad that popped up was for that odd, obscure equipment cart that we had just been talking about.

    It turned out that these guys had been discussing this subject earlier, and now it was confirmed for all of us.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The one that did it for me - I was in the car with my wife and a friend. We were driving down the highway and talking about the clouds we saw. And I said “I wander what kind of clouds those are. Like cumulus? Alto?”

      The I take out my phone and type “types of” and the first auto-fill option that came up was “types of cloud” and I was like “there’s no fucking way that just happens to be the highest suggested search prompt”

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        It won’t be long before we’ll be getting into sexy time with the spouse, and the phone on the nightstand dings with a notification. You pause to check it, and it’s an ad for a new sex lube!

    • Art3mis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The fun part is that they dnt even need to listen for this. They track everything you search, link it to your phones ip, number, and location. But it doesnt stop there. They know people will talk to the people they are around.

      So if person A searches something 2 days ago and then goes to hang out with person B who has similar interests, they will serve ads about those products to person B because they figure it will be relevant at some point. Basically, the prediction software is so good that it comes off as listening to every word you said.

      They are def also listening, but this is more often what is happening. Use a vpn and privacy focused browser and you will notice the relevance of ads drop significantly

      • Neverbeaten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        What ads? My browser blocks ads. My vpn blocks ads. I pay for email so don’t see ads there. I pay for search so I don’t see ads there, either. I self host media. My TV doesn’t connect to the internet.

        I seriously never see ads.

        • knee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 hours ago

          👍 Well done there. Using Brave, DDG, Ecosia and Firefox. Got Mulvad, got Tuta. Pay for search? Who with? Moving towards self hosting. Just ditched internet on my TV.

        • Art3mis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yes. This suggestion is for folks that are tired of constant ads. Not folks that are already doing what i just suggested lol

  • meathorse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Think of something you’ve never mentioned or discussed before, then out of nowhere, start having a conversation with a friend about it, how much you like it and are thinking about getting it, taking lessons etc then see what happens over the next week on either your or your friend’s ads (turn off ad blocker if you use one).

    I recommend something completely unusual for most people like an instrument (didgeridoo or cowbell)

  • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every device made to receive voice commands (Smart TVs, Amazon Echo) WILL listen to everything you say.

    And if they provide a button or setting to turn that off you are relying on trusting them to comply with it (I don’t think they do and even if they are found doing it they will probably pay a minuscule fine for it)

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          One of many,

          https://www.gadgetreview.com/federal-surveillance-tech-becomes-mandatory-in-new-cars-by-2027

          "The tech involves infrared cameras mounted on steering columns or A-pillars, tracking eye movement, pupil dilation, and drowsiness patterns. Unlike the breathalyzer ignition interlocks from DUI convictions, these systems operate passively—no blowing required. Your car simply watches and decides whether you’re fit to drive.

          If the AI determines you’re impaired (blood alcohol ≥0.08% or showing fatigue), it can prevent ignition startup or limit vehicle speed. Think Minority Report, but for your morning commute."

          Not that new cars aren’t already tracked every moment and government controlled, they are. This is just a worse version of it.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      He also gave his famous opinion about Facebook users. Deep down, he agrees with privacy advocates. The diff is that he’s a shitty enough person to take advantage of the less techy people out there even if his society will be damaged badly in the process. Most of us are not that shitty.

      they trust me

      dumb fucks

      I think we can move beyond Facebook here. Trusting big tech with your data never works out well.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The very notion of proof implies that you can reproduce it. So I would suggest you forget what anybody here or elsewhere said. Instead, you :

    • get a cheap phone (so typically Android)
    • reset/format/flash it to a blank state
    • make a new testing account on it
    • use for random browsing, using app, etc and you log your history, namely what did you actually do AND what ads you actually see
    • test for something outside of your new habits with a search query, then log and compare again, seeing the threshold to change
    • repeat the last step for something said using e.g. a voice assistant, log&compare
    • repeat WITHOUT explicit search, log&compare

    Yes this takes a of time but that will help you make YOUR own opinion on the matter if you genuinely care.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pre-tech, God and/or your conscience was always watching and listening. Now others are watching and listening too.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The manufacturers tell you.

    And they even make you click the “I have read and understood this” button under the document that explicitly states that they’re spying on you and selling all your data.