altr

  • pringus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i am going to use the partially ai-written, human reviewed kernel that can be forked and used for free, over the vibe-coded to shit ONE-HUNDRED AND FOURTY DOLLAR operating system that tried to eat itself alive last week

    • alapakala@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think, you misread the entire point of my reference: Linux doesn’t have LLM, it has a fascist+spam problem.

      • pringus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        gonne be honest i probably did, things have been rough this week year

        i thought it was highlighting linus defending people using AI to a certain extent, but i don’t know any further context because my brain can barely perceive that site sorry

        • alapakala@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Linus was defending his use Claude Mythos, while the initial email was questioning what to do with the spam commits affecting contributions. Linus called his subordinates “social warriors” for not accepting spam into his project.
          It’s like Linus has no vision or solution to spam commits. It’s like he doesn’t understand “technology” and “had better be looking in the mirror and pointing at [himself] at the same time.” He figuratively placed his “head in the sand and s[a]ng ‘La La La, I can’t hear you’ at the top of” the commit tree.