JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoFor my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down11
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkFor my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comJoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml to Fediverse@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoNSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
minus-squareJoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agofair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
minus-squareThe Doctor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoI don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
minus-squareJoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoI thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
NSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
fair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
I don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
I thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug