• spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The other possibility is that plenty of analysts, historians, cultural advisors, etc know exactly how things work and what’s going on but he doesn’t listen to them because they’re ‘little people’.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep, they tend to not listen to them because they listen to their PR people, polls etc., more. It’s sad, but after years of trying to see politics in its full complexity I’m coming back to “politicians are the problem”. At least those that win elections. How can we turn that ship around?

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Maybe we should have talent agents that campaign for candidates. Winning a campaign is a whole skillset that tells us very little how well a person can actually govern.

        • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think a more interesting political system would be a random lottery. Make it a burden. Take a vote at the end of a term to decide if the office holder should be executed.

            • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              I think that might work well at a local or state level, and have the population vote them to national office if they represent them well and are willing. I don’t think we want some of my neighbors legislating. At least not the guy I saw ripping off a can of galaxy gas on his front porch.