• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    its funny that your are linking a lemmy.world cross post through piefed, but we can’t view it because piefed requires login. even though the content is not from there…

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Sure, we all get that it can be trendy to bring an old look back but… you know.

    In an unrelated story:

    Somone claims to have just seen Harry Caray climbing from his grave, collecting an oversized net, muttering something about one… two… three strikes… before heading towards silicon valley.

    • RustyNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In the case of France there’s two possible broken laws (not a lawyer btw):

      • If the glasses wearer upload the video/photo online, you are one of the primary subject of the frame (aka not just in he background), and didn’t consent to being on the internet, you can sue.

      • Companies must legally ask you for your concent to collect personal and identifying information. If the video/photo is sent to meta for big data/ai training, they must ask for consent

      Edit: “primary subject” is kinda vague and may change depending on the context. If you do a VLOG and someone does something funny in the background, not aware of the camera, and the video is re-uploaded to only feature the guy, then it becomes the primary subject, and must be asked for concent

    • dbx12@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Just break the law and hope the other side is too poor to sue. Basically like everywhere else on the planet.

        • dbx12@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          In general yes, but if you claim a glasshole recorded you without consent and want to sue them, it’s on you to fund that legal battle. I doubt collectives are interested in individual cases.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I don’t normally such punching people because they wear glasses…. But I think an exception should be made.

    They’re very punch-able glasses.