I’ve seen a lot of people who quite dislike Manjaro, and I’m not really sure why. I’m myself am not a Manjaro user, but I did use it for quite a while and enjoyed my experienced, as it felt almost ready out of the box. I’m not here to judge, just wanted to hear the opinion of the community on the matter. Thanks!

  • zlatiah@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Opinion you said?.. https://manjarno.snorlax.sh/

    Thankfully the Manjaro team didn’t seem to have a major mess-up recently, but they did have some very troubled past. Especially now that Arch has a real installer that bundles entire DEs for you, the premise of using an “Arch Linux but easy to use” OS seems less and less

    To each their own though! Nothing wrong with using Manjaro at all if someone really likes it

  • rizoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Manjaro is what got me into Arch so I’ll always have a soft spot for it. I don’t keep up with internet drama so much but I do remember people saying some stuff about the devs being shady/shitty. But I’m not sure how much truth there is to that.

  • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Never used it, but in my mind it will always be the distribution that told its users to roll the date on their machines back because they forgot to renew their website’s SSL certificate.

    Twice.

  • Choctaw@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have an XFCE VM of Manjaro I regularly use and it’s a great distribution. I converted mine to unstable, which just means it pulls down Arch packages right away so closer to Endeavor OS or ArcoLinux (there is also stable and testing). They have some nice tools and very easy to change kernels. I think some people have had it break something and get butt hurt, but that’s part of bleeding edge Arch and being on a rolling release. Either watch the forum for issues, or be prepared to fix it, roll back… Some of us think life is too short to do a manual Arch install, so these Arch based distros that are easy to install are great, and add some extra value and tools on top of Arch.

  • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I doesn’t deserve the hate it gets, it’s not that big of a project but it’s being treated like it pushed kids to kill themselves, the devs fucked up a few times and made some questionable decision (freeoffice…) but they put upe a nice working distro and aren’t completely insane like the gnome/ubuntu devs

  • obsoulete@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I installed Manjaro sometime during 2018, and I have been using it without any major issues. The only issue I had is when AUR packages fail to update. I find that most of the time the issue will resolve itself eventually anyway. Overall, I feel that Manjaro is a nice and stable distro.

    The only negative I can think of is the community. At the time, I was bluntly told to read the manual whenever I needed help or pointers. But, my negative experience was from a few years ago, so hopefully the community has improved today.

    My daily driver distro today is Mint, which I think is more polished than Manjaro.

  • DayDuJour@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I ran Manjaro for a year or so. It works well and the default theming looks great but I don’t really see a point to the distro really. It’s basically just Arch from a couple weeks ago with no AUR support.

      • DayDuJour@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I used to as well and it always caused issues. AUR packages are not designed to be used with Manjaro packages, stuff can break and updates get funky. That’s why Manjaro disables it by default.

        • Gatsby@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s still different than not having AUR support.

          I get that though. I’ve only had issues with Nvidia drivers during a kernal upgrade but. Haven’t had problems with AUR myself and I use it frequently for over a year at least

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Manjaro was my intro to Linux, but now that I know more about it, I can’t recommend it in good conscience. Letting their SSL certs expire is something that happens (even though they could automate it), but telling their users to change their clocks so it works is a big no-no.

    Worse than that is how they manage packages from upstream. Simply freezing them for two weeks is, in my opinion, the worst of both worlds. You don’t get timely security updates, but you still end up with the issues of being on the bleeding edge - just late. It also means that if you use the AUR (which is really one of the biggest perks of Arch-based systems), it’s possible that the necessary dependencies are out of date.

    I think that if one wants “Arch with an installer” they should go with EndeavourOS, or try the archinstall script.

      • Einar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can you expand on this? A source would be great here to properly debunk this.