LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agoI try not to date people hotter than me for this reasonpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up1354
arrow-up1354imageI try not to date people hotter than me for this reasonpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squareAxolotl@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 hours agowlw is a little more generic, like, a wlw could be lesbian, bisexual* or whatever while lesbian is only wlw *bisexual, as the name suggest is someone who see more than 1 gender attractive
minus-squareqarbone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoThe construction of the sentence is just getting to me: “wlw…with a gf.” It feels like the important part is “having a gf,” and “having the gf” implies the “wlw.” So you could have just left off the “wlw.”
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours ago “having the gf” implies the “wlw.” Only if you already knew (or assumed) that the person who posted it was female. I, for one, didn’t pay attention to the username or avatar pic, so for me, it was a helpful clarification.
wlw is a little more generic, like, a wlw could be lesbian, bisexual* or whatever while lesbian is only wlw
*bisexual, as the name suggest is someone who see more than 1 gender attractive
The construction of the sentence is just getting to me: “wlw…with a gf.”
It feels like the important part is “having a gf,” and “having the gf” implies the “wlw.” So you could have just left off the “wlw.”
Only if you already knew (or assumed) that the person who posted it was female. I, for one, didn’t pay attention to the username or avatar pic, so for me, it was a helpful clarification.
Far enough