• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    plainly, I’d say it’s state repression. they struck fear in their hearts in the state struck back.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s incredibly unspecific, repression is one of the main things states do and is a broad category.

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        they were hunted down and framed for crimes. they were executed. they were exiled.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I feel like they probably shouldn’t have done those things then, if they weren’t able to sustain themselves in the face of that sort of state repression like communists could.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I know you disagree with anarchist tactics. That’s what our whole discussion is about.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Do you not also disagree with those tactics, given how spectacularly they’ve failed to amount to anything material?

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                no. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.